Literature DB >> 15984813

Ineffectiveness and poor reliability of arsenic removal plants in West Bengal, India.

M Amir Hossain1, Mrinal Kumar Sengupta, Sad Ahamed, Mohammad Mahmudur Rahman, Debapriya Mondal, Dilip Lodh, Bhaskar Das, Bishwajit Nayak, Bimal K Roy, Amitava Mukherjee, Dipankar Chakraborti.   

Abstract

In the recent past, arsenic contamination in groundwater has emerged as an epidemic in different Asian countries, such as Bangladesh, India, and China. Arsenic removal plants (ARP) are one possible option to provide arsenic-safe drinking water. This paper evaluates the efficiency of ARP projects in removing arsenic and iron from raw groundwater, on the basis of our 2-year-long study covering 18 ARPs from 11 manufacturers, both from home and abroad, installed in an arsenic affected area of West Bengal, India, known as the Technology Park Project (TP project). Immediately after installation of ARPs on August 29, 2001, the villagers began using filtered water for drinking and cooking, even though our first analysis on September 13, 2001 found that 10 of 13 ARPs failed to remove arsenic below the WHO provisional guideline value (10 microg/L), while six plants could not achieve the Indian Standard value (50 microg/L). The highest concentration of arsenic in filtered water was observed to be 364 microg/L. Our 2-year study showed that none of the ARPs could maintain arsenic in filtered water below the WHO provisional guideline value and only two could meet the Indian standard value (50 microg/L) throughout. Standard statistical techniques showed that ARPs from the same manufacturers were not equally efficient. Efficiency of the ARPs was evaluated on the basis of point and interval estimates of the proportion of failure. During the study period almost all the ARPs have undergone minor or major modifications to improve their performance, and after our study, 15 (78%) out of 18 ARPs were no longer in use. In this study, we also analyzed urine samples from villagers in the TP project area and found that 82% of the samples contained arsenic above the normal limit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15984813     DOI: 10.1021/es048703u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

1.  Pollution magnet: nano-magnetite for arsenic removal from drinking water.

Authors:  Cafer T Yavuz; J T Mayo; Carmen Suchecki; Jennifer Wang; Adam Z Ellsworth; Helen D'Couto; Elizabeth Quevedo; Arjun Prakash; Laura Gonzalez; Christina Nguyen; Christopher Kelty; Vicki L Colvin
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Ecosystem perspective of groundwater arsenic contamination in India and relevance in policy.

Authors:  Atanu Sarkar
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 3.184

3.  Distribution of Arsenic and Risk Assessment of Activities on Soccer Pitches Irrigated with Arsenic-Contaminated Water.

Authors:  Nadia Martínez-Villegas; Abraham Hernández; Diana Meza-Figueroa; Bhaskar Sen Gupta
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Arsenic exposure in drinking water: an unrecognized health threat in Peru.

Authors:  Christine Marie George; Laura Sima; M Helena Jahuira Arias; Jana Mihalic; Lilia Z Cabrera; David Danz; William Checkley; Robert H Gilman
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Access to drinking-water and arsenicosis in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Bruce K Caldwell; Wayne T Smith; Kamalini Lokuge; Geetha Ranmuthugala; Keith Dear; Abul H Milton; Malcolm R Sim; Jack C Ng; S N Mitra
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Diversity of arsenite oxidizing bacterial communities in arsenic-rich deltaic aquifers in West Bengal, India.

Authors:  Devanita Ghosh; Punyasloke Bhadury; Joyanto Routh
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Arsenic Removal from Groundwater by Solar Driven Inline-Electrolytic Induced Co-Precipitation and Filtration-A Long Term Field Test Conducted in West Bengal.

Authors:  Philipp Otter; Pradyut Malakar; Bana Bihari Jana; Thomas Grischek; Florian Benz; Alexander Goldmaier; Ulrike Feistel; Joydev Jana; Susmita Lahiri; Juan Antonio Alvarez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.