OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin. Aprepitant is a neurokinin-1 (NK1)-receptor antagonist developed as an antiemetic for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, two-period, parallel-group study. During period 1, warfarin was individually titrated to a stable prothrombin time (expressed as international normalized ratio, INR) from 1.3 to 1.8. Subsequently, the daily warfarin dose remained fixed for 10-12 days. During period 2, the warfarin dose was continued for 8 days, and on days 1-3 administered concomitantly with aprepitant (125 mg on day 1, and 80 mg on days 2 and 3) or placebo. At baseline (day -1 of period 2) and on day 3, warfarin pharmacokinetics was investigated. INR was monitored daily. During period 2, warfarin trough concentrations were determined daily. RESULTS: The study was completed by 22 healthy volunteers (20 men, 2 women). On day 3, steady-state pharmacokinetics of warfarin enantiomers after aprepitant did not change, as assessed by warfarin AUC(0-24 h) and C(max). However, compared with placebo, trough S(-) warfarin concentrations decreased on days 5-8 (maximum decrease 34% on day 8, P<0.01). The INR decreased after aprepitant with a mean maximum decrease on day 8 of 11% versus placebo (P=0.011). CONCLUSION: These data are consistent with a significant induction of CYP2C9 metabolism of S(-) warfarin by aprepitant. Subsequently, in patients on chronic warfarin therapy, the clotting status should be monitored closely during the 2-week period, particularly at 7-10 days, following initiation of the 3-day regimen of aprepitant with each chemotherapy cycle.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin. Aprepitant is a neurokinin-1 (NK1)-receptor antagonist developed as an antiemetic for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, two-period, parallel-group study. During period 1, warfarin was individually titrated to a stable prothrombin time (expressed as international normalized ratio, INR) from 1.3 to 1.8. Subsequently, the daily warfarin dose remained fixed for 10-12 days. During period 2, the warfarin dose was continued for 8 days, and on days 1-3 administered concomitantly with aprepitant (125 mg on day 1, and 80 mg on days 2 and 3) or placebo. At baseline (day -1 of period 2) and on day 3, warfarin pharmacokinetics was investigated. INR was monitored daily. During period 2, warfarin trough concentrations were determined daily. RESULTS: The study was completed by 22 healthy volunteers (20 men, 2 women). On day 3, steady-state pharmacokinetics of warfarin enantiomers after aprepitant did not change, as assessed by warfarin AUC(0-24 h) and C(max). However, compared with placebo, trough S(-) warfarin concentrations decreased on days 5-8 (maximum decrease 34% on day 8, P<0.01). The INR decreased after aprepitant with a mean maximum decrease on day 8 of 11% versus placebo (P=0.011). CONCLUSION: These data are consistent with a significant induction of CYP2C9 metabolism of S(-) warfarin by aprepitant. Subsequently, in patients on chronic warfarin therapy, the clotting status should be monitored closely during the 2-week period, particularly at 7-10 days, following initiation of the 3-day regimen of aprepitant with each chemotherapy cycle.
Authors: Jacqueline B McCrea; Anup K Majumdar; Michael R Goldberg; Marian Iwamoto; Cynthia Gargano; Deborah L Panebianco; Michael Hesney; Christopher R Lines; Kevin J Petty; Paul J Deutsch; M Gail Murphy; Keith M Gottesdiener; D Ronald Goldwater; Robert A Blum Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: D Campos; J R Pereira; R R Reinhardt; C Carracedo; S Poli; C Vogel; J Martinez-Cedillo; A Erazo; J Wittreich; L O Eriksson; A D Carides; B J Gertz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Paul J Hesketh; Steven M Grunberg; Richard J Gralla; David G Warr; Fausto Roila; Ronald de Wit; Sant P Chawla; Alexandra D Carides; Juliana Ianus; Mary E Elmer; Judith K Evans; Klaus Beck; Scott Reines; Kevin J Horgan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-10-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Craig R Shadle; Yih Lee; Anup K Majumdar; Kevin J Petty; Cynthia Gargano; Thomas E Bradstreet; Judith K Evans; Robert A Blum Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Anup K Majumdar; Jacqueline B McCrea; Deborah L Panebianco; Michael Hesney; James Dru; Marvin Constanzer; Michael R Goldberg; Gail Murphy; Keith M Gottesdiener; Christopher R Lines; Kevin J Petty; Robert A Blum Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Su-Er W Huskey; Brian J Dean; George A Doss; Zhen Wang; Cornelis E C A Hop; Reza Anari; Paul E Finke; Albert J Robichaud; Minghua Zhang; Bonnie Wang; John R Strauss; Paul K Cunningham; William P Feeney; Ronald B Franklin; Thomas A Baillie; Shuet-Hing L Chiu Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Philip L Mar; Rakesh Gopinathannair; Brooke E Gengler; Mina K Chung; Arturo Perez; Jonathan Dukes; Michael D Ezekowitz; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy; Gregory Y H Lip; Mike Miletello; Peter A Noseworthy; James Reiffel; James E Tisdale; Brian Olshansky Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2022-05-27