Literature DB >> 15982584

Modeling and analysis of PET studies with norepinephrine transporter ligands: the search for a reference region.

Jean Logan1, Yu-Shin Ding, Kuo-Shyan Lin, Deborah Pareto, Joanna Fowler, Anat Biegon.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The development of positron emission tomography (PET) ligands for the norepinephrine transporter (NET) has been slow compared to the development of radiotracers for others systems, such as the dopamine (DAT) or the serotonin transporters (SERT). The main reason for this appears to be the high nonspecific (non-NET) binding exhibited by many of these tracers, which makes the identification of a reference region difficult. With other PET ligands the use of a reference region increases the reproducibility of the outcome measure in test/retest studies. The focus of this work is to identify a suitable reference region or means of normalizing data for the NET ligands investigated.
METHODS: We have analyzed the results of PET studies in the baboon brain with labeled reboxetine derivatives (S,S)-[(11)C]O-methyl reboxetine (SS-MRB), (S,S)-[(18)F]fluororeboxetine (SS-FRB) as well as O-[(11)C]nisoxetine and N-[(11)C]nisoxetine (NIS), and, for comparison, the less active (R,R) enantiomers (RR-MRB, RR-FRB) in terms of the distribution volume (DV) using measured arterial input functions.
RESULTS: (1) For a given subject, a large variation in DV for successive baseline studies was observed in regions with both high and low NET density. (2) The occipital cortex and the basal ganglia were found to be the regions with the smallest change between baseline (SS-MRB) and pretreatment with cocaine, and were therefore used as a composite reference region for calculation of a distribution volume ratio (DVR). (3) The variability [as measured by the coefficient of variation (CV) = standard deviation/mean] in the distribution volume ratio (DVR) of thalamus (to reference region) was considerably reduced over that of the DV using this composite reference region. (4) Pretreatment with nisoxetine (1.0 mg/kg 10 min prior to tracer) in one study produced (in decreasing order) reductions in thalamus, cerebellum, cingulate and frontal cortex consistent with known NET densities. (5) [(11)C]Nisoxetine had a higher background non-NET binding (DV) than the other tracers reported here with basal ganglia (a non-NET region) higher than thalamus.
CONCLUSIONS: The reboxetine derivatives show a lot of promise as tracers for human PET studies of the norepinephrine system. We have identified a strategy for normalizing DVs to a reference region with the understanding that the DVR for these tracers may not be related to the binding potential in the same way as, for example, for the dopamine tracers, since the non-NET binding may differ between the target and nontarget regions. From our baboon studies the average DVR for thalamus (n = 18) for SS-MRB is 1.8; however, the lower limit is most likely less than 1 due to this difference in non-NET binding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15982584     DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Biol        ISSN: 0969-8051            Impact factor:   2.408


  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of [(11)C]MRB for assessment of occupancy of norepinephrine transporters: Studies with atomoxetine in non-human primates.

Authors:  Jean-Dominique Gallezot; David Weinzimmer; Nabeel Nabulsi; Shu-Fei Lin; Krista Fowles; Christine Sandiego; Timothy J McCarthy; R Paul Maguire; Richard E Carson; Yu-Shin Ding
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Progression of cellular adaptations in medial prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortex in response to repeated amphetamine.

Authors:  Houman Homayoun; Bita Moghaddam
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Estimating neurotransmitter kinetics with ntPET: a simulation study of temporal precision and effects of biased data.

Authors:  Marc D Normandin; Evan D Morris
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Inhibitory control and emotional stress regulation: neuroimaging evidence for frontal-limbic dysfunction in psycho-stimulant addiction.

Authors:  Chiang-shan Ray Li; Rajita Sinha
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Compartmental modeling of [(11)C]MENET binding to the norepinephrine transporter in the healthy human brain.

Authors:  Vikram Adhikarla; Fanxing Zeng; John R Votaw; Mark M Goodman; Jonathon A Nye
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Fluorine-18 Radiolabeled PET Tracers for Imaging Monoamine Transporters: Dopamine, Serotonin, and Norepinephrine.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Stehouwer; Mark M Goodman
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2009-01

Review 7.  Positron emission tomography studies of organophosphate chemical threats and oxime countermeasures.

Authors:  Charles M Thompson; John M Gerdes; Henry F VanBrocklin
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 5.996

8.  In vivo assessment of [11C]MRB as a prospective PET ligand for imaging the norepinephrine transporter.

Authors:  Alin J Severance; Matthew S Milak; J S Dileep Kumar; Jaya Prabhakaran; Vattoly J Majo; Norman R Simpson; Ronald L Van Heertum; Victoria Arango; J John Mann; Ramin V Parsey
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Association of posttraumatic stress disorder with reduced in vivo norepinephrine transporter availability in the locus coeruleus.

Authors:  Robert H Pietrzak; Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Yu-Shin Ding; Shannan Henry; Marc N Potenza; Steven M Southwick; John H Krystal; Richard E Carson; Alexander Neumeister
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 21.596

10.  Synthesis and evaluation of radioiodinated (S,S)-2-(alpha-(2-iodophenoxy)benzyl)morpholine for imaging brain norepinephrine transporter.

Authors:  Naoki Kanegawa; Yasushi Kiyono; Hiroyuki Kimura; Taku Sugita; Satomi Kajiyama; Hidekazu Kawashima; Masashi Ueda; Yuji Kuge; Hideo Saji
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.