Literature DB >> 15982534

Effects of foreperiod duration on anticipatory postural adjustments: determination of an optimal preparation in standing and sitting for a raising arm movement.

Rémy Cuisinier1, Isabelle Olivier, Vincent Nougier.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present experiment was to examine the motor and postural preparation processes evolving during the foreperiod (known to be optimal at 500 ms in sitting) in a voluntary upper limb movement executed while standing. The foreperiod duration (300, 500, 700 and 900 ms) and the postural conditions (sitting versus standing) were manipulated using a priming procedure. Two types of prime were provided: (1) a prime giving valid information on the side of the raising arm movement to execute, and (2) a prime giving non-valid information (prime opposite to the required side). In a sitting and standing condition, eight normal subjects performed a raising arm movement with a 1 kg load at the level of the wrist. Premotor time and acceleration of arm movement were recorded in the two postural conditions. In the standing condition, anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) were also quantified using the relative latency of electromyographic (EMG) data and the centre of foot pressure (CoP) displacements. Results (1) showed that the optimal foreperiod duration (i.e., leading to the shortest premotor time) increased as a function of postural conditions (500 versus 700 ms in the sitting and standing conditions, respectively), and (2) emphasized the existence of a temporal modulation in the central organization of the postural and focal commands according to the foreperiod duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15982534     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Bull        ISSN: 0361-9230            Impact factor:   4.077


  8 in total

1.  Coordination between postural and movement controls: effect of changes in body mass distribution on postural and focal component characteristics.

Authors:  Gilles Robert; Jean Blouin; Hélène Ruget; Laurence Mouchnino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Facilitation of cutaneous inputs during the planning phase of gait initiation.

Authors:  Laurence Mouchnino; Aurélie Fontan; Christophe Tandonnet; Joy Perrier; Anahid H Saradjian; Anahid Saradjian; Jean Blouin; Martin Simoneau
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Grip force control during gait initiation with a hand-held object.

Authors:  Gudrun Diermayr; Priska Gysin; Chris J Hass; Andrew M Gordon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Posture-related modulations in motor cortical excitability of the proximal and distal arm muscles.

Authors:  Shailesh S Kantak; George F Wittenberg; Wan-Wen Liao; Laurence S Magder; Mark W Rogers; Sandy McCombe Waller
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  The increased foreperiod duration to attain the neutral optimal preparation from sitting to standing.

Authors:  Rémy Cuisinier; Isabelle Olivier; Vincent Nougier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  Anteroposterior perception of the trunk position while seated without the feet touching the floor.

Authors:  Hitoshi Asai; Soma Endo; Pleiades Tiharu Inaoka
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-11-24

7.  Startle Increases the Incidence of Anticipatory Muscle Activations but Does Not Change the Task-Specific Muscle Onset for Patients After Subacute Stroke.

Authors:  Nan Xia; Chang He; Yang-An Li; Minghui Gu; Zejian Chen; Xiupan Wei; Jiang Xu; Xiaolin Huang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Effect of Standing on a Standardized Measure of Upper Extremity Function.

Authors:  Jill Campbell Stewart; Ashley Saba; Jessica F Baird; Melissa B Kolar; Michael O'Donnell; Sydney Y Schaefer
Journal:  OTJR (Thorofare N J)       Date:  2020-07-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.