OBJECTIVES: Dengue shock syndrome is a leading cause of mortality among Indian children. In January 2000, we instituted a protocol for aggressive management of children with dengue shock syndrome. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes (duration of ventilation, pediatric intensive care unit stay, incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome, and intensive care unit and hospital mortality) before and after the protocol. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit at a tertiary teaching hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred and fourteen patients admitted between July 1997 and December 1999 received standard therapy recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and were designated as the WHO guidelines group (W), whereas 96 patients admitted between January 2000 and December 2001 were treated by our protocol and designated as the protocol group (P). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The patients in each group were equally matched in terms of age, Pediatric Risk of Mortality, and number with dengue hemorrhage fever grade IV, although the platelet counts were higher in the W group compared with the P group (geometric mean 42.2, confidence interval 36.9, 48.4 vs. geometric mean 36.7, confidence interval 33.3, 40.5, p < .05). Patients in the W group received less fluids in the first hour compared with the P group (median and interquartile range 20 mL/kg, 15 and 20 vs. 30 mL/kg, 20 and 60). Fluid was actively removed less often in the W group than the P group (6 of 111 vs. 45 of 96, p < .05). There was no difference in the need for ventilation or incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome between groups, although among dengue hemorrhage fever grade IV patients, the number requiring ventilation (17 of 30 vs. 20 of 23, p < .05) and the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (9 of 30 vs. 17 of 23, p < .05) were significantly greater in the W group compared with the P group. The duration of ventilation (1.5 +/- 1.7 vs. 4.2 +/- 2.9 days, p < .05) and length of intensive care unit stay (3.0 +/- 2.8 vs. 3.4 +/- 2.9 days, p < .05) were significantly less in the W group. The pediatric intensive care unit mortality (16.6% vs. 6.3%, p < .05) was significantly higher in the W group than in the P group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with dengue shock syndrome are at high risk of mortality due to refractory shock and multiple organ failure. Survival was better for patients in the P group. Aggressive shock management and possibly the use of judicious fluid removal may decrease mortality rates in the severest forms of dengue shock syndrome.
OBJECTIVES:Dengue shock syndrome is a leading cause of mortality among Indian children. In January 2000, we instituted a protocol for aggressive management of children with dengue shock syndrome. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes (duration of ventilation, pediatric intensive care unit stay, incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome, and intensive care unit and hospital mortality) before and after the protocol. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit at a tertiary teaching hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred and fourteen patients admitted between July 1997 and December 1999 received standard therapy recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and were designated as the WHO guidelines group (W), whereas 96 patients admitted between January 2000 and December 2001 were treated by our protocol and designated as the protocol group (P). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The patients in each group were equally matched in terms of age, Pediatric Risk of Mortality, and number with dengue hemorrhage fever grade IV, although the platelet counts were higher in the W group compared with the P group (geometric mean 42.2, confidence interval 36.9, 48.4 vs. geometric mean 36.7, confidence interval 33.3, 40.5, p < .05). Patients in the W group received less fluids in the first hour compared with the P group (median and interquartile range 20 mL/kg, 15 and 20 vs. 30 mL/kg, 20 and 60). Fluid was actively removed less often in the W group than the P group (6 of 111 vs. 45 of 96, p < .05). There was no difference in the need for ventilation or incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome between groups, although among dengue hemorrhage fever grade IV patients, the number requiring ventilation (17 of 30 vs. 20 of 23, p < .05) and the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (9 of 30 vs. 17 of 23, p < .05) were significantly greater in the W group compared with the P group. The duration of ventilation (1.5 +/- 1.7 vs. 4.2 +/- 2.9 days, p < .05) and length of intensive care unit stay (3.0 +/- 2.8 vs. 3.4 +/- 2.9 days, p < .05) were significantly less in the W group. The pediatric intensive care unit mortality (16.6% vs. 6.3%, p < .05) was significantly higher in the W group than in the P group. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with dengue shock syndrome are at high risk of mortality due to refractory shock and multiple organ failure. Survival was better for patients in the P group. Aggressive shock management and possibly the use of judicious fluid removal may decrease mortality rates in the severest forms of dengue shock syndrome.
Authors: Allan R Brasier; Hyunsu Ju; Josefina Garcia; Heidi M Spratt; Sundar S Victor; Brett M Forshey; Eric S Halsey; Guillermo Comach; Gloria Sierra; Patrick J Blair; Claudio Rocha; Amy C Morrison; Thomas W Scott; Isabel Bazan; Tadeusz J Kochel Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Allan R Brasier; Josefina Garcia; John E Wiktorowicz; Heidi M Spratt; Guillermo Comach; Hyunsu Ju; Adrian Recinos; Kizhake Soman; Brett M Forshey; Eric S Halsey; Patrick J Blair; Claudio Rocha; Isabel Bazan; Sundar S Victor; Zheng Wu; Susan Stafford; Douglas Watts; Amy C Morrison; Thomas W Scott; Tadeusz J Kochel Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Sophie Yacoub; Anna Griffiths; Tran Thi Hong Chau; Cameron P Simmons; Bridget Wills; Tran Tinh Hien; Michael Henein; Jeremy Farrar Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Joe Brierley; Joseph A Carcillo; Karen Choong; Tim Cornell; Allan Decaen; Andreas Deymann; Allan Doctor; Alan Davis; John Duff; Marc-Andre Dugas; Alan Duncan; Barry Evans; Jonathan Feldman; Kathryn Felmet; Gene Fisher; Lorry Frankel; Howard Jeffries; Bruce Greenwald; Juan Gutierrez; Mark Hall; Yong Y Han; James Hanson; Jan Hazelzet; Lynn Hernan; Jane Kiff; Niranjan Kissoon; Alexander Kon; Jose Irazuzta; Jose Irazusta; John Lin; Angie Lorts; Michelle Mariscalco; Renuka Mehta; Simon Nadel; Trung Nguyen; Carol Nicholson; Mark Peters; Regina Okhuysen-Cawley; Tom Poulton; Monica Relves; Agustin Rodriguez; Ranna Rozenfeld; Eduardo Schnitzler; Tom Shanley; Saraswati Kache; Sara Skache; Peter Skippen; Adalberto Torres; Bettina von Dessauer; Jacki Weingarten; Timothy Yeh; Arno Zaritsky; Bonnie Stojadinovic; Jerry Zimmerman; Aaron Zuckerberg Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: R P Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes; Djillali Annane; Herwig Gerlach; Steven M Opal; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Ivor S Douglas; Roman Jaeschke; Tiffany M Osborn; Mark E Nunnally; Sean R Townsend; Konrad Reinhart; Ruth M Kleinpell; Derek C Angus; Clifford S Deutschman; Flavia R Machado; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Steven Webb; Richard J Beale; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rui Moreno Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 17.440