Literature DB >> 15982157

Human listeners are able to classify dog (Canis familiaris) barks recorded in different situations.

Péter Pongrácz1, Csaba Molnár, Adám Miklósi, Vilmos Csányi.   

Abstract

The authors investigated whether human listeners could categorize played-back dog (Canis familiaris) barks recorded in various situations and associate them with emotional ratings. Prerecorded barks of a Hungarian herding dog breed (Mudi) provided the sample. Human listeners were asked to rate emotionality of the vocalization and to categorize the situations on the basis of alternative situations provided on a questionnaire. The authors found almost no effect of previous experience with the given dog breed or of owning a dog. Listeners were able to categorize bark situations high above chance level. Emotionality ratings for particular bark samples correlated with peak and fundamental frequency and interbark intervals. The authors did not find a significant effect of tonality (harmonic-to-noise ratio) on either the emotionality rating or situation categorization of the human listeners. Humans' ability to recognize meaning suggests that barks could serve as an effective means of communication between dog and human. 2005 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15982157     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.2.136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  34 in total

1.  Heterogeneity of hunting ability and nutritional status among domestic dogs in lowland Nicaragua.

Authors:  Jeremy M Koster; Kenneth B Tankersley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A multi-sensory code for emotional arousal.

Authors:  Beau Sievers; Caitlyn Lee; William Haslett; Thalia Wheatley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Explosive vocal activity for attracting human attention is related to domestication in silver fox.

Authors:  Svetlana S Gogoleva; Ilya A Volodin; Elena V Volodina; Anastasia V Kharlamova; Lyudmila N Trut
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Vocalization toward conspecifics in silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes) selected for tame or aggressive behavior toward humans.

Authors:  S S Gogoleva; I A Volodin; E V Volodina; A V Kharlamova; L N Trut
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  The gradual vocal responses to human-provoked discomfort in farmed silver foxes.

Authors:  Svetlana S Gogoleva; Elena V Volodina; Ilya A Volodin; Anastasia V Kharlamova; Lyudmila N Trut
Journal:  Acta Ethol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 1.231

6.  Snort acoustic structure codes for positive emotions in horses.

Authors:  Mathilde Stomp; Maël Leroux; Marjorie Cellier; Séverine Henry; Martine Hausberger; Alban Lemasson
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2018-09-12

7.  Humans recognize emotional arousal in vocalizations across all classes of terrestrial vertebrates: evidence for acoustic universals.

Authors:  Piera Filippi; Jenna V Congdon; John Hoang; Daniel L Bowling; Stephan A Reber; Andrius Pašukonis; Marisa Hoeschele; Sebastian Ocklenburg; Bart de Boer; Christopher B Sturdy; Albert Newen; Onur Güntürkün
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Dog experts' brains distinguish socially relevant body postures similarly in dogs and humans.

Authors:  Miiamaaria V Kujala; Jan Kujala; Synnöve Carlson; Riitta Hari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Adult vampire bats produce contact calls when isolated: acoustic variation by species, population, colony, and individual.

Authors:  Gerald G Carter; Ryane Logsdon; Bryan D Arnold; Angelica Menchaca; Rodrigo A Medellin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Human perception of fear in dogs varies according to experience with dogs.

Authors:  Michele Wan; Niall Bolger; Frances A Champagne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.