Literature DB >> 15981295

Individual growth curve models for assessing evidence-based referral criteria in growth monitoring.

P van Dommelen1, S van Buuren, G R J Zandwijken, P H Verkerk.   

Abstract

The goal of this study is to assess whether a growth curve model approach will lead to a more precise detection of Turner sydnrome (TS) than conventional referral criteria for growth monitoring. The Jenss-Bayley growth curve model was used to describe the process of growth over time. A new screening rule is defined on the parameters of this growth curve model, parental height and gestational age. The rule is applied to longitudinal growth data of a group of children with TS (n=777) and a reference (n=487) group. The outcome measures are sensitivity, specificity and median referral age. Growth curve parameters for TS children were different from reference children and can therefore be used for screening. The Jenss-Bayley growth model, which uses all longitudinal measurements from birth to a maximum age of 5 years with at least one measurement after the age of 2, together with parental height and gestational age can achieve a sensitivity of 85.2 per cent with a specificity of 99.5 per cent and a median referral age of 4.2 (the last measurement between the age of 2 and 5 of each child is considered to be the moment of referral). Sensitivity increases by 2 percentage points when decreasing the specificity to 99 per cent. The Jenss-Bayley growth model from birth to a maximum age of 8 years with at least one measurement after the age of 2, together with parental height results in a sensitivity of 89.0 per cent with a specificity of 99.5 per cent and a median referral age of 6.1. For a specificity of 98 per cent, we obtain a sensitivity of 92.3 per cent. In comparison to conventional rules applied to the same data, sensitivity is about 11-30 percentage points higher at the same level of specificity for the Jenss-Bayley growth rule. We conclude that from the age of 4, growth curve models can improve the screening on TS to conventional screening rules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15981295     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  3 in total

1.  Postnatal weight and height growth velocities at different ages between birth and 5 y and body composition in adolescent boys and girls.

Authors:  Jérémie Botton; Barbara Heude; Jean Maccario; Pierre Ducimetière; Marie-Aline Charles
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Multi-level modelling of longitudinal child growth data from the Birth-to-Twenty Cohort: a comparison of growth models.

Authors:  Esnat D Chirwa; Paula L Griffiths; Ken Maleta; Shane A Norris; Noel Cameron
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 1.533

3.  A new Swedish reference for total and prepubertal height.

Authors:  Kerstin Albertsson-Wikland; Aimon Niklasson; Anton Holmgren; Lars Gelander; Andreas F M Nierop
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 2.299

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.