Literature DB >> 15981268

Docking to single-domain and multiple-domain proteins: old and new challenges.

E Ben-Zeev1, N Kowalsman, A Ben-Shimon, D Segal, T Atarot, O Noivirt, T Shay, M Eisenstein.   

Abstract

The diverse selection of targets in the CAPRI experiments provides grounds for determining the limits of our rigid-body docking program MolFit, and for extending it. We find that the sensitivity of MolFit is high, enabling it to produce reasonably accurate docking solutions when the structures undergo moderate local conformation changes upon complex formation or when the docked molecules are modeled. Yet the ranks of these solutions are sometimes too low to meet the requirements of CAPRI assessment. This indicates that the selectivity of MolFit, which was optimized for docking of unbound X-ray structures, and which relies on the availability of external data from biochemical and bioinformatic sources, needs readjustment in order to meet the challenges presented by NMR or modeled structures. A different challenge is presented by large global conformation changes such as movements of domains. We show that such changes can be accommodated within the rigid-body approximation by employing rigid multibody multistage docking procedures. We also address the difficulty of ranking results from 2-body and multibody docking scans in cases in which there are no external data favoring one option over the other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15981268     DOI: 10.1002/prot.20557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  9 in total

1.  AIDA: ab initio domain assembly for automated multi-domain protein structure prediction and domain-domain interaction prediction.

Authors:  Dong Xu; Lukasz Jaroszewski; Zhanwen Li; Adam Godzik
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Determining macromolecular assembly structures by molecular docking and fitting into an electron density map.

Authors:  Keren Lasker; Andrej Sali; Haim J Wolfson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-11-15

Review 3.  Principles of flexible protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Nelly Andrusier; Efrat Mashiach; Ruth Nussinov; Haim J Wolfson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-11-01

4.  Conformer selection and induced fit in flexible backbone protein-protein docking using computational and NMR ensembles.

Authors:  Sidhartha Chaudhury; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Accounting for large amplitude protein deformation during in silico macromolecular docking.

Authors:  Karine Bastard; Adrien Saladin; Chantal Prévost
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Global computational mutagenesis of domain structures associated with inherited eye disease.

Authors:  Francisca Wood Ortiz; Yuri V Sergeev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  SnugDock: paratope structural optimization during antibody-antigen docking compensates for errors in antibody homology models.

Authors:  Aroop Sircar; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Structural assembly of two-domain proteins by rigid-body docking.

Authors:  Tammy M K Cheng; Tom L Blundell; Juan Fernandez-Recio
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Evolution of In Silico Strategies for Protein-Protein Interaction Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Stephani Joy Y Macalino; Shaherin Basith; Nina Abigail B Clavio; Hyerim Chang; Soosung Kang; Sun Choi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 4.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.