Literature DB >> 15981213

Comparison of Surgical Risk Score, POSSUM and p-POSSUM in higher-risk surgical patients.

M J Brooks1, R Sutton, S Sarin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Much current interest is focused on the use of the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) and the Portsmouth predictor equation (p-POSSUM) for risk-adjusted surgical audit. The Surgical Risk Score (SRS) has been shown to offer an equivalent accuracy, but was validated using a cohort that contained a high proportion of low-risk patients. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of mortality prediction using SRS with that of POSSUM and p-POSSUM in a cohort of higher-risk patients.
METHODS: Some 949 consecutive patients undergoing inpatient surgical procedures in a district general hospital under the care of a single surgeon were analysed.
RESULTS: The observed 30-day mortality rate was 8.4 per cent. Mean mortality rates predicted using SRS, POSSUM and p-POSSUM scores were 5.9, 12.6 and 7.3 per cent respectively. No significant difference was observed in the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curves for the three methods.
CONCLUSION: The SRS accurately predicted mortality in higher-risk surgical patients. The accuracy of prediction equalled that of POSSUM and p-POSSUM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15981213     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  33 in total

1.  Intraperitoneal mesh implantation for fascial dehiscence and open abdomen.

Authors:  Moritz Scholtes; Anita Kurmann; Christian A Seiler; Daniel Candinas; Guido Beldi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Prospective evaluation of in-hospital mortality with the P-POSSUM scoring system in patients undergoing major digestive surgery.

Authors:  Féthi Merad; Gabriel Baron; Blandine Pasquet; Henry Hennet; Gérard Kohlmann; Fred Warlin; Bruno Desrousseaux; Abe Fingerhut; Philippe Ravaud; Jean-Marie Hay
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Modified physiological and operative score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity risk assessment model in general surgery.

Authors:  Lian-An Ding; Li-Qun Sun; Shuang-Xi Chen; Lin-Lin Qu; Dong-Fang Xie
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Comparison of P-POSSUM and O-POSSUM in predicting mortality after oesophagogastric resections.

Authors:  J S Nagabhushan; S Srinath; F Weir; W J Angerson; B A Sugden; C G Morran
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Predicting post-operative mortality in patients undergoing colorectal surgery using P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM scores: a prospective study.

Authors:  Edmund Leung; Ali M Ferjani; Nigel Stellard; Ling S Wong
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.571

6. 

Authors:  Berrin Günaydın; Ömer Kurtipek
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-06-01

7.  Evaluation of O-POSSUM vs ASA and APACHE II scores in patients undergoing oesophageal surgery.

Authors:  Raluca Fodor; Adrian Cioc; Bianca Grigorescu; Bogdan Lăzescu; Sanda Maria Copotoiu
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2015-04

8.  Elective and emergency abdominal surgery in patients 90 years of age or older.

Authors:  Jennifer Racz; Luc Dubois; Adam Katchky; William Wall
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 9.  A review of risk scoring systems utilised in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Aninda Chandra; Sudhakar Mangam; Deya Marzouk
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Perioperative vasopressors are associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  Tanya Zakrison; Bartolomeu A Nascimento; Lorraine N Tremblay; Alex Kiss; Sandro B Rizoli
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.