Literature DB >> 15979877

Accuracy of implantation of components in the Oxford knee using the minimally invasive approach.

David Shakespeare1, Michael Ledger, Vera Kinzel.   

Abstract

Screened postoperative X-rays of 224 Oxford knees implanted through the minimally invasive approach were analysed using 16 criteria. The technique was as recommended by the Oxford Group except that the femoral intramedullary rod was used only as a guide to flexion/extension of the femoral component. All femoral components were within the recommended range for varus/valgus and mediolateral position. Eighteen femoral components were either too flexed or extended, but by a maximum of only 10 degrees . Tibial components were inserted in slight varus (mean 1.8 degrees , S.D. 8.8, range 10 to -10). All were within the range for posterior slope in spite of difficulty in establishing objective landmarks. Tibial coverage was imprecise with the phase 3 implants which were short and broad relative to the cut surface. In 36% of knees the tibial tray was implanted too anterior resulting in posterior under hang. There have been no clinical signs to indicate tipping of the meniscus in deep flexion. The depth of cement penetration under the keel was excessive in three cases, resulting from porotic bone rather than technical error in the depth of the cut. There has been one case of femoral component loosening following a fall and no tibial loosening in spite of imprecise alignment of some components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15979877     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2005.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  10 in total

1.  Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of 83 patients.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Francesco Iacono; Alessandro Russo; Stefano Zaffagnini; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Simone Bignozzi; Laura Bragonzoni; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Correlation of positioning and clinical results in Oxford UKA.

Authors:  Michael Clarius; Christian Hauck; Joern B Seeger; Maria Pritsch; Christian Merle; Peter R Aldinger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Sagittal flexion angle of the femoral component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is it same for both medial and lateral UKAs?

Authors:  Elcil Kaya Bicer; Elvire Servien; Sebastien Lustig; Guillaume Demey; Tarik Ait Si Selmi; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The effect of C-arm fluoroscope on unicompartmental knee replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hee-Gon Park; Kun-Woong Yu; Sung-Hyun Kim; Dong-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-08-10

5.  FACTORS AFFECTING THE FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF OXFORD PHASE 3 UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY.

Authors:  Ayşe Esin Polat; Bariş Polat; Tahsin Gürpinar; Bariş Peker; Tolga Tüzüner
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.513

6.  New Instrumentation Improves Patient Satisfaction and Component Positioning for Mobile-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Rajesh Malhotra; Vijay Kumar; Naman Wahal; Arnaud Clavé; James A Kennedy; David W Murray; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  Cementless Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement-Clinical and Radiological Results of 228 Knees with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Benjamin Panzram; Mira Mandery; Tobias Reiner; Tobias Gotterbarm; Marcus Schiltenwolf; Christian Merle
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Outcome of mobile and fixed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and risk factors for revision.

Authors:  Murat Saylık; Ali Erkan Yenigul; Teoman Atıcı
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 1.573

9.  Correction of coronal alignment correlates with reconstruction of joint height in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  U Kuwashima; K Okazaki; Y Tashiro; H Mizu-Uchi; S Hamai; S Okamoto; K Murakami; Y Iwamoto
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  Intentionally Increased Flexion Angle of the Femoral Component in Mobile Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kye-Youl Cho; Kang-Il Kim; Sang-Jun Song; Kyu-Jin Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-03-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.