Literature DB >> 15979713

The use of predatory soil mites in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts, with perspectives for oribatid mites.

Andrea Ruf1, Ludwig Beck.   

Abstract

Gamasina are the main predators among the soil mesofauna and, therefore, have a crucial position in the soil food web and contribute significantly to energy and matter turnover. Ecological concepts including predatory mites in soil assessment have not yet been established, while standardized sampling, extraction, and conservation methods are available. There are reliable keys for Europe that cover most families. Few species in low dominance ranks correlate well with soil properties like soil texture and pH. Meaningful endpoints for soil assessment are community parameters that are based on the life history of the species (e.g., Maturity Index). It has been shown that the predatory mites, as well as the oribatids as a second common and widespread group of mites, fit well into a soil assessment concept comparable to RIVPACS, which was established for aquatic systems. Perspectives for future research are the development of a computer-aided identification key and the creation of a database with information on the ecology and biogeography of important species.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15979713     DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.03.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  11 in total

1.  Community structures of Mesostigmata, Prostigmata and Oribatida in broad-leaved regeneration forests and conifer plantations of various ages.

Authors:  Motohiro Hasegawa; Kimiko Okabe; Kenji Fukuyama; Shun'ichi Makino; Isamu Okochi; Hiroshi Tanaka; Hideaki Goto; Takeo Mizoguchi; Tadashi Sakata
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Mesostigmatid mites in four classes of wood decay.

Authors:  Dariusz J Gwiazdowicz; Jacek Kamczyc; Radosław Rakowski
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 3.  The use of soil mites in ecotoxicology: a review.

Authors:  Pierre Huguier; Nicolas Manier; Olugbenga John Owojori; Pascale Bauda; Pascal Pandard; Jörg Römbke
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  The effect of herbivore faeces on the edaphic mite community: implications for tapeworm transmission.

Authors:  Radovan Václav; Stanislav Kalúz
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Fertilizer addition lessens the flux of microbial carbon to higher trophic levels in soil food webs of grassland.

Authors:  Kathleen Lemanski; Stefan Scheu
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Effects of a mulch layer on the assemblage and abundance of mesostigmatan mites and other arthropods in the soil of a sugarcane agro-ecosystem in Australia.

Authors:  M Manwaring; H M Wallace; H J Weaver
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.132

7.  Species diversity of edaphic mites (Acari: Oribatida) and effects of topography, soil properties and litter gradients on their qualitative and quantitative composition in 64 km² of forest in Amazonia.

Authors:  Jamile de Moraes; Elizabeth Franklin; José Wellington de Morais; Jorge Luiz Pereira de Souza
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.132

8.  The enigma of soil animal species diversity revisited: the role of small-scale heterogeneity.

Authors:  Uffe N Nielsen; Graham H R Osler; Colin D Campbell; Roy Neilson; David F R P Burslem; René van der Wal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of habitat age and plant species on predatory mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) in grassy arable fallows in Eastern Austria.

Authors:  Janet Wissuwa; Jörg-Alfred Salamon; Thomas Frank
Journal:  Soil Biol Biochem       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.609

10.  Response of Collembola and Acari communities to summer flooding in a grassland plant diversity experiment.

Authors:  Odette González-Macé; Stefan Scheu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.