OBJECTIVE: This study is a meta-analysis of the literature exploring the relationship between child sexual abuse (CSA) and HIV risk behavior among women. Four outcome variables were tested: unprotected sex; sex with multiple partners; sex trading; and adult sexual revictimization. METHOD: Forty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis, and separate meta-analyses were performed for each of the four dependent variables described above. RESULTS: Using the correlation coefficient r as an effect size estimate, results indicate an average effect size of .05 for the unprotected sex meta-analysis (N = 16 studies), .13 for the sex with multiple partners meta-analysis (N = 23 studies), .12 for the sex trading meta-analysis (N = 23 studies), and .17 for the adult sexual revictimization meta-analysis (N = 21 studies). We conducted a test of three potential moderator variables (source of sample, definition of CSA based on type of contact, and definition of CSA based on maximum age of victim). Results did not support the hypothesis that these three variables explain a significant amount of variability in effect sizes with one exception: Studies that define CSA more broadly to include adolescent victims (e.g., victims up to 17 years of age) had larger and more homogenous effect sizes for the sex trading meta-analysis than those that defined CSA as having occurred at younger ages. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a small positive relationship between CSA and subsequent HIV risk behavior among women that varies as a function of how CSA and HIV risk behavior are operationalized.
OBJECTIVE: This study is a meta-analysis of the literature exploring the relationship between childsexual abuse (CSA) and HIV risk behavior among women. Four outcome variables were tested: unprotected sex; sex with multiple partners; sex trading; and adult sexual revictimization. METHOD: Forty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis, and separate meta-analyses were performed for each of the four dependent variables described above. RESULTS: Using the correlation coefficient r as an effect size estimate, results indicate an average effect size of .05 for the unprotected sex meta-analysis (N = 16 studies), .13 for the sex with multiple partners meta-analysis (N = 23 studies), .12 for the sex trading meta-analysis (N = 23 studies), and .17 for the adult sexual revictimization meta-analysis (N = 21 studies). We conducted a test of three potential moderator variables (source of sample, definition of CSA based on type of contact, and definition of CSA based on maximum age of victim). Results did not support the hypothesis that these three variables explain a significant amount of variability in effect sizes with one exception: Studies that define CSA more broadly to include adolescent victims (e.g., victims up to 17 years of age) had larger and more homogenous effect sizes for the sex trading meta-analysis than those that defined CSA as having occurred at younger ages. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a small positive relationship between CSA and subsequent HIV risk behavior among women that varies as a function of how CSA and HIV risk behavior are operationalized.
Authors: Jennifer E Johnson; Marlanea E Peabody; Wendee M Wechsberg; Rochelle K Rosen; Karen Fernandes; Caron Zlotnick Journal: J Interpers Violence Date: 2014-11-12
Authors: Audrey Brooks; Christina S Meade; Jennifer Sharpe Potter; Yuliya Lokhnygina; Donald A Calsyn; Shelly F Greenfield Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Harold D Green; Joan S Tucker; Suzanne L Wenzel; Daniela Golinelli; David P Kennedy; Gery W Ryan; Annie J Zhou Journal: Child Abuse Negl Date: 2012-01-20
Authors: Christina S Meade; Melissa H Watt; Kathleen J Sikkema; Lisa X Deng; Krista W Ranby; Donald Skinner; Desiree Pieterse; Seth C Kalichmann Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2012-06-19 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Michael S Boroughs; Sarah E Valentine; Gail H Ironson; Jillian C Shipherd; Steven A Safren; S Wade Taylor; Sannisha K Dale; Joshua S Baker; Julianne G Wilner; Conall O'Cleirigh Journal: Arch Sex Behav Date: 2015-07-10