Literature DB >> 15979666

Comparison of effects of estradiol (E2) with those of octylmethoxycinnamate (OMC) and 4-methylbenzylidene camphor (4MBC)--2 filters of UV light - on several uterine, vaginal and bone parameters.

D Seidlová-Wuttke1, H Jarry, J Christoffel, G Rimoldi, W Wuttke.   

Abstract

OMC and 4MBC are 2 absorbers of ultraviolet light which are used in unknown quantities in sunscreens, cosmetics and plastic products to protect against UV light-induced damage of the skin or of fragrances or plastic material. From there, they were shown to reach surface water and/or by direct contamination or ingestion the human. Under various conditions in mice and rats, both substances were shown to be estrogenic. Therefore, we compared in vitro and in vivo the effects of chronic application of these compounds at 2 doses with those of E2, all administered via food. No signs of toxicity were observed under application of 0.6 mg E2, 57.5 or 275 mg of OMC, 57.5 or 250 mg of 4MBC; these amounts were ingested with 21 g of control food, 17.8 g E2 food, 20.6 g or 22.3 g OMC food and 23.7 or 22.8 g 4MBC food. In the uterus, vagina and bone, E2 exerted the expected stimulatory effects which were minimally shared by OMC and 4MBC in the uterus and vagina as assessed by histology and determination of a variety of estrogen-regulated genes such as insulin-like growth factor-1, progesterone receptor and estrogen receptor beta. In the bone, OMC had no effect, while 4MBC shared the antiosteoporotic effects of E2 as measured by quantitative computer tomography in the metaphysis of the tibia. The mechanism of action of 4MBC, however, appears to be different as E2 reduced serum osteocalcin and the C-terminal breakdown products of collagen-1alpha1 which were both increased by 4MBC. Taken together, these data indicate a very weak estrogenic effect of OMC and 4MBC in the uterus and in the vagina but not in the bone where 4MBC exerted antiosteoporotic effects by a different mechanism than E2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15979666     DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2005.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  5 in total

1.  Sunscreens and their usefulness: have we made any progress in the last two decades?

Authors:  Nick Serpone
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Bone development in female rats maintained with soy-free or soy-containing food as determined by computer-assisted tomography and serum bone markers.

Authors:  Dana Seidlová-Wuttke; Hubertus Jarry; Yvonne Jäger; Wolfgang Wuttke
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  Neurotoxic effect of active ingredients in sunscreen products, a contemporary review.

Authors:  Joanna A Ruszkiewicz; Adi Pinkas; Beatriz Ferrer; Tanara V Peres; Aristides Tsatsakis; Michael Aschner
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2017-05-27

4.  Region-specific growth effects in the developing rat prostate following fetal exposure to estrogenic ultraviolet filters.

Authors:  Luke Hofkamp; Sarahann Bradley; Jesus Tresguerres; Walter Lichtensteiger; Margret Schlumpf; Barry Timms
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Recent Advances on Endocrine Disrupting Effects of UV Filters.

Authors:  Jiaying Wang; Liumeng Pan; Shenggan Wu; Liping Lu; Yiwen Xu; Yanye Zhu; Ming Guo; Shulin Zhuang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.