Literature DB >> 15979175

FISH and chips: marine bacterial communities analyzed by flow cytometry based on microfluidics.

G Gerdts1, G Luedke.   

Abstract

To unveil the structure of natural marine pelagic bacterial communities, PCR-based techniques as well as fluorescence in situ hybridizations (FISH) were successfully performed in the past. Using fluorescence microscopes or confocal laser scanning microscopes (CLSM) for the analysis of FISH experiments, it was possible to differentiate bacterial communities, but most attempts to combine flow cytometry and FISH for this purpose have failed till now. Here we present a successful analysis of FISH experiments of natural marine pelagic bacterial communities using a flow cytometer based on microfluidics (Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer). Marine water samples were enriched on polycarbonate filters and hybridized with Cy5 labeled gene probes of different phylogenetic depth. Bacteria were detached from the filters and subsequently analyzed in the Cell Chip of the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Samples were counter-stained using SYTOX. In all samples the EUB338 positive signals could be clearly differentiated from those of the NON probe. Furthermore a dominance of alpha-protebacteria (as indicated by the probes ALF968 and G rB) could be observed. Microfluidics based flow cytometry is a promising technique for the analysis of natural bacterial communities from the marine environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15979175     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  7 in total

1.  Optofluidic characterization of marine algae using a microflow cytometer.

Authors:  Nastaran Hashemi; Jeffrey S Erickson; Joel P Golden; Frances S Ligler
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Microfluidic fluorescence in situ hybridization and flow cytometry (μFlowFISH).

Authors:  Peng Liu; Robert J Meagher; Yooli K Light; Suzan Yilmaz; Romy Chakraborty; Adam P Arkin; Terry C Hazen; Anup K Singh
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  Suitability of flow cytometry for estimating bacterial biovolume in natural plankton samples: comparison with microscopy data.

Authors:  Marisol Felip; Stefan Andreatta; Ruben Sommaruga; Viera Straskrábová; Jordi Catalan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  The good, the bad, and the tiny: a review of microflow cytometry.

Authors:  Daniel A Ateya; Jeffrey S Erickson; Peter B Howell; Lisa R Hilliard; Joel P Golden; Frances S Ligler
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  Optimization of two immunofluorescent antibodies for the detection of Escherichia coli using immunofluorescent microscopy and flow cytometry.

Authors:  Moira McCarthy; Sarah C Culloty
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 6.  The intersection of flow cytometry with microfluidics and microfabrication.

Authors:  Menake E Piyasena; Steven W Graves
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 7.  Potential of Flow Cytometric Approaches for Rapid Microbial Detection and Characterization in the Food Industry-A Review.

Authors:  Elena Zand; Antje Froehling; Christoph Schoenher; Marija Zunabovic-Pichler; Oliver Schlueter; Henry Jaeger
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-12-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.