Literature DB >> 15978289

Avoidance of Cu- and Zn-contaminated soil by three ecologically different earthworm species.

Tuomas Lukkari1, Jari Haimi.   

Abstract

Earthworm avoidance response to soils contaminated with harmful substances has been proposed as a potential tool for assessing soil toxicity with low test effort. In the present study, the objective was to find out whether three ecologically different earthworm species, Aporrectodea tuberculata (Eisen), Lumbricus rubellus (Hoffmeister), and Dendrobaena octaedra (Savigny), avoid soils simultaneously spiked with Cu and Zn. In addition, metal-contaminated field soil taken close to a Cu-Ni smelter was tested with A. tuberculata using a two-section avoidance lest procedure. All three earthworm species clearly avoided Cu/Zn contaminated soil but differently: D. octaedra was the most sensitive species, responding to low metal concentrations, whereas L. rubellus responded only to the highest metal concentration tested, being the least sensitive species. Moreover, A. tuberculata showed clear avoidance response to the metal contaminated field soil. In conclusion, the results indicate that earthworm avoidance behavior is an ecologically relevant parameter for assessing harmfulness of metal contaminated soils, both spiked and field-contaminated soils. However, it is important to consider the specific species to be used in the earthworm avoidance test procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15978289     DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  9 in total

1.  Heavy metal pollution affects consumption and reproduction of the landsnail Cepaea nemoralis fed on naturally polluted Urtica dioica leaves.

Authors:  Martje J M Notten; Annelies J P Oosthoek; Jelte Rozema; Rien Aerts
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Evidence for avoidance of Ag nanoparticles by earthworms (Eisenia fetida).

Authors:  W A Shoults-Wilson; Oksana I Zhurbich; David H McNear; Olga V Tsyusko; Paul M Bertsch; Jason M Unrine
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Can the soil fauna of boreal forests recover from lead-derived stress in a shooting range area?

Authors:  Salla Selonen; Mira Liiri; Heikki Setälä
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Cadmium transfer and detoxification mechanisms in a soil-mulberry-silkworm system: phytoremediation potential.

Authors:  Lingyun Zhou; Ye Zhao; Shuifeng Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Statement of the PPR Panel on a framework for conducting the environmental exposure and risk assessment for transition metals when used as active substances in plant protection products (PPP).

Authors:  Antonio Hernandez-Jerez; Paulien Adriaanse; Annette Aldrich; Philippe Berny; Tamara Coja; Sabine Duquesne; Andreas Focks; Marinovich Marina; Maurice Millet; Olavi Pelkonen; Aaldrik Tiktak; Christopher Topping; Anneli Widenfalk; Martin Wilks; Gerrit Wolterink; Arnaud Conrad; Silvia Pieper
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-03-29

6.  Increased cytotoxic and genotoxic tolerance of Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta) to cadmium after long-term exposure.

Authors:  P Voua Otomo; S A Reinecke
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Metallothionein gene expression differs in earthworm populations with different exposure history.

Authors:  M Mustonen; J Haimi; A Väisänen; K E Knott
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 8.  Effects of metals on earthworm life cycles: a review.

Authors:  S Sivakumar
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Variation in gene expression within clones of the earthworm Dendrobaena octaedra.

Authors:  Marina Mustonen; Jari Haimi; Jenni Kesäniemi; Harri Högmander; K Emily Knott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.