Literature DB >> 15977294

FDR-controlling testing procedures and sample size determination for microarrays.

Shuying S Li1, Jeannette Bigler, Johanna W Lampe, John D Potter, Ziding Feng.   

Abstract

Microarrays are used increasingly to identify genes that are truly differentially expressed in tissues under different conditions. Planning such studies requires establishing a sample size that will ensure adequate statistical power. For microarray analyses, false discovery rate (FDR) is considered to be an appropriate error measure. Several FDR-controlling procedures have been developed. How these procedures perform for such analyses has not been evaluated thoroughly under realistic assumptions. In order to develop a method of determining sample sizes for these procedures, it needs to be established whether these procedures really control the FDR below the pre-specified level so that the determined sample size indeed provides adequate power. To answer this question, we first conducted simulation studies. Our simulation results showed that these procedures do control the FDR at most situations but under-control the FDR when the proportion of positive genes is small, the most likely scenarios. Thus, these existing procedures can overestimate the power and underestimate the sample size. Accordingly, we developed a simulation-based method to provide more accurate estimates for power and sample size. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15977294     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  17 in total

1.  Improving the quality of biomarker discovery research: the right samples and enough of them.

Authors:  Margaret S Pepe; Christopher I Li; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  Laser capture sampling and analytical issues in proteomics.

Authors:  Howard B Gutstein; Jeffrey S Morris
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.940

3.  Practical guidelines for assessing power and false discovery rate for a fixed sample size in microarray experiments.

Authors:  Tiejun Tong; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  A parametric model to estimate the proportion from true null using a distribution for p-values.

Authors:  Chang Yu; Daniel Zelterman
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 1.681

5.  Using DNA microarrays to assay part function.

Authors:  Virgil A Rhodius; Carol A Gross
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  False discovery rates for rare variants from sequenced data.

Authors:  Marinela Capanu; Venkatraman E Seshan
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Machine learning-based receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for crisp and fuzzy classification of DNA microarrays in cancer research.

Authors:  Leif E Peterson; Matthew A Coleman
Journal:  Int J Approx Reason       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.816

8.  Sample size and statistical power considerations in high-dimensionality data settings: a comparative study of classification algorithms.

Authors:  Yu Guo; Armin Graber; Robert N McBurney; Raji Balasubramanian
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Microproteomics: analysis of protein diversity in small samples.

Authors:  Howard B Gutstein; Jeffrey S Morris; Suresh P Annangudi; Jonathan V Sweedler
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 10.946

10.  Power and sample size estimation in microarray studies.

Authors:  Wei-Jiun Lin; Huey-Miin Hsueh; James J Chen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.