Literature DB >> 1597709

Cholinergic modulation of cortical associative memory function.

M E Hasselmo1, B P Anderson, J M Bower.   

Abstract

1. The effect of cholinergic modulation on associative memory function was studied in a computational model based on the physiology and anatomic structure of piriform cortex. Both the cholinergic suppression of intrinsic fiber synaptic transmission and the cholinergic changes in postsynaptic excitability described in the companion paper were examined. 2. Distributed input patterns representing odors were stored in the model with the use of a synaptic modification rule dependent on pre- and postsynaptic activity (i.e., Hebbian). Associative recall of these patterns was tested by presenting the model with degraded versions of the learned patterns and testing whether these degraded patterns evoked the same network response as the full learned input pattern. Storage was evaluated with the use of a performance measure designed to reflect how well degraded input patterns could be recognized as a particular learned input pattern. 3. When memory function was evaluated with a selective cholinergic suppression of intrinsic fiber synaptic transmission during learning, associative memory performance was greatly enhanced. Cholinergic suppression during learning prevents previously stored patterns from interfering with the storage of new patterns. 4. When memory function was evaluated with a cholinergic mediated enhancement in cell excitability during learning, the speed of learning increased, but so did the decay in performance due to interference during learning. 5. When suppression of intrinsic fiber synaptic transmission was coupled with an increase in cell excitability, the best memory performance was obtained. 6. These results provide a possible theoretical framework for linking the neuropharmacological effects of acetylcholine to behavioral evidence for a role of acetylcholine in memory function. This could help describe how memory deficits might arise from cholinergic dysfunction in diseases such as Alzheimer's dementia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1597709     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1992.67.5.1230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  51 in total

1.  Muscarinic inhibition of recurrent glutamatergic excitation in frog tectum column prevents NMDA receptor activation on efferent neuron.

Authors:  Armantas Baginskas; Antanas Kuras
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Disruption of odour quality coding in piriform cortex mediates olfactory deficits in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Wen Li; James D Howard; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 3.  Olfactory imagery: a review.

Authors:  Richard J Stevenson; Trevor I Case
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

4.  The level of cholinergic nucleus basalis activation controls the specificity of auditory associative memory.

Authors:  Norman M Weinberger; Alexandre A Miasnikov; Jemmy C Chen
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Functional characterization of intrinsic cholinergic interneurons in the cortex.

Authors:  Jakob von Engelhardt; Marina Eliava; Axel H Meyer; Andrei Rozov; Hannah Monyer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Muscarinic receptors control frequency tuning through the downregulation of an A-type potassium current.

Authors:  Lee D Ellis; Rüdiger Krahe; Charles W Bourque; Robert J Dunn; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Olfactory discrimination learning in mice lacking the fragile X mental retardation protein.

Authors:  John Larson; Daniel Kim; Roseanne C Patel; Christina Floreani
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Cholinergic activation and tonic excitation induce persistent gamma oscillations in mouse somatosensory cortex in vitro.

Authors:  E H Buhl; G Tamás; A Fisahn
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Muscarinic blockade slows and degrades the location-specific firing of hippocampal pyramidal cells.

Authors:  E S Brazhnik; R U Muller; S E Fox
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  RACK1 is involved in β-amyloid impairment of muscarinic regulation of GABAergic transmission.

Authors:  Wenhua Liu; Fei Dou; Jian Feng; Zhen Yan
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 4.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.