Literature DB >> 15976580

Adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis to silicone-hydrogel contact lenses.

Mariana Henriques1, Cláudia Sousa, Madalena Lira, M Elisabete, Real Oliveira, Rosário Oliveira, Joana Azeredo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the adhesion capabilities of the most important etiologic agents of microbial ocular infection to the recently available silicone-hydrogel lenses with those to a conventional hydrogel lens.
METHODS: In vitro static adhesion assays of Pseudomonas aeruginosa 10,145, Staphylococcus epidermidis 9142 (biofilm-positive), and 12,228 (biofilm-negative) to two extended-wear silicone-hydrogel lenses (balafilcon A and lotrafilcon A), a daily wear silicone-hydrogel lens (galyfilcon A) and a conventional hydrogel (etafilcon A) were performed. To interpret the adhesion results, lens surface relative hydrophobicity was assessed by water contact angle measurements.
RESULTS: P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis 9142 exhibited greater adhesion capabilities to the extended wear silicone-hydrogel lenses than to the daily wear silicone- and conventional hydrogel lenses (p < 0.05). No statistical differences were found between the adhesion extent of these strains to galyfilcon A and etafilcon A. The biofilm negative strain of S. epidermidis adhered in larger extents to the silicone-hydrogel lenses than to the conventional hydrogel (p < 0.05), but in much lower amounts than the biofilm-positive strain. The water contact angle measurements revealed that the extended wear silicone-hydrogel lenses are hydrophobic, whereas the daily wear silicone- and conventional hydrogel lenses are hydrophilic.
CONCLUSIONS: As a result of their hydrophobicity, the extended wear silicone-hydrogel lenses (lotrafilcon A and balafilcon A) may carry higher risk of microbial contamination than both the hydrophilic daily wear silicone-hydrogel lens, galyfilcon A and the conventional hydrogel lens, etafilcon A.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15976580     DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000168585.53845.64

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  26 in total

1.  Risk factors for corneal infiltrative events during continuous wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

Authors:  Loretta Szczotka-Flynn; Jonathan H Lass; Ajay Sethi; Sara Debanne; Beth Ann Benetz; Matthew Albright; Beth Gillespie; Jana Kuo; Michael R Jacobs; Alfred Rimm
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Dynamics of flagellum- and pilus-mediated association of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with contact lens surfaces.

Authors:  Victoria B Tran; Suzanne M J Fleiszig; David J Evans; Clayton J Radke
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  The association of contact lens solution use and Acanthamoeba keratitis.

Authors:  Charlotte E Joslin; Elmer Y Tu; Megan E Shoff; Gregory C Booton; Paul A Fuerst; Timothy T McMahon; Robert J Anderson; Mark S Dworkin; Joel Sugar; Faith G Davis; Leslie T Stayner
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Dynamics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa association with anionic hydrogel surfaces in the presence of aqueous divalent-cation salts.

Authors:  Victoria B Tran; Ye Suel Sung; Suzanne M J Fleiszig; David J Evans; C J Radke
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 8.128

5.  Candida albicans and Pseudomonas aeruginosa adhesion on soft contact lenses.

Authors:  Fatma Kaynak Onurdağ; Semiha Ozkan; Selda Ozgen; Hülya Olmuş; Ufuk Abbasoğlu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Bacterial adhesion to conventional hydrogel and new silicone-hydrogel contact lens materials.

Authors:  Laurent Kodjikian; Emmanuelle Casoli-Bergeron; Florence Malet; Hélène Janin-Manificat; Jean Freney; Carole Burillon; Joseph Colin; Jean-Paul Steghens
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  A three-phase in-vitro system for studying Pseudomonas aeruginosa adhesion and biofilm formation upon hydrogel contact lenses.

Authors:  Claudia Rändler; Rutger Matthes; Andrew J McBain; Bernd Giese; Martin Fraunholz; Rabea Sietmann; Thomas Kohlmann; Nils-Olaf Hübner; Axel Kramer
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  Increased resistance of contact lens-related bacterial biofilms to antimicrobial activity of soft contact lens care solutions.

Authors:  Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Yoshifumi Imamura; Jyotsna Chandra; Changping Yu; Pranab K Mukherjee; Eric Pearlman; Mahmoud A Ghannoum
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Antibacterial and physical properties of a novel sonochemical-assisted Zn-CuO contact lens nanocoating.

Authors:  Yoav Nahum; Reut Israeli; Gabriel Mircus; Ilana Perelshtein; Miriam Ehrenberg; Shay Gutfreund; Aharon Gedanken; Irit Bahar
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  In vivo activity of anprocide alone, and in vitro activity in combination with conventional antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms.

Authors:  Robin K Pettit; Christine A Weber; Stacey B Lawrence; George R Pettit; Melissa J Kean; Gary D Cage
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 2.472

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.