RATIONALE: Little is known about environmental exposure to low levels of naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) and malignant mesothelioma (MM) risk. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a cancer registry-based case control study of residential proximity to NOA with MM in California. METHODS: Incident MM cases (n = 2,908) aged 35 yr or more, diagnosed between 1988 and 1997, were selected from the California Cancer Registry and frequency matched to control subjects with pancreatic cancer (n = 2,908) by 5-yr age group and sex. Control subjects were selected by stratified random sampling from 28,123 incident pancreatic cancers in the same time period. We located 93.7% of subjects at the house or street level at initial diagnosis. Individual occupational exposure to asbestos was derived from the longest held occupation, available for 74% of MM cases and 63% of pancreatic cancers. Occupational exposure to asbestos was determined by a priori classification and confirmed by association with mesothelioma. MAIN RESULTS: The adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence interval for low, medium, and high probabilities of occupational exposures to asbestos were 1.71 (1.32-2.21), 2.51 (1.91-3.30), and 14.94 (8.37-26.67), respectively. Logistic regression analysis from a subset of 1,133 mesothelioma cases and 890 control subjects with pancreatic cancer showed that the odds of mesothelioma decreased approximately 6.3% for every 10 km farther from the nearest asbestos source, an odds ratio of 0.937 (95% confidence interval = 0.895-0.982), adjusted for age, sex, and occupational exposure to asbestos. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the hypothesis that residential proximity to NOA is significantly associated with increased risk of MM in California.
RATIONALE: Little is known about environmental exposure to low levels of naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) and malignant mesothelioma (MM) risk. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a cancer registry-based case control study of residential proximity to NOA with MM in California. METHODS: Incident MM cases (n = 2,908) aged 35 yr or more, diagnosed between 1988 and 1997, were selected from the California Cancer Registry and frequency matched to control subjects with pancreatic cancer (n = 2,908) by 5-yr age group and sex. Control subjects were selected by stratified random sampling from 28,123 incident pancreatic cancers in the same time period. We located 93.7% of subjects at the house or street level at initial diagnosis. Individual occupational exposure to asbestos was derived from the longest held occupation, available for 74% of MM cases and 63% of pancreatic cancers. Occupational exposure to asbestos was determined by a priori classification and confirmed by association with mesothelioma. MAIN RESULTS: The adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence interval for low, medium, and high probabilities of occupational exposures to asbestos were 1.71 (1.32-2.21), 2.51 (1.91-3.30), and 14.94 (8.37-26.67), respectively. Logistic regression analysis from a subset of 1,133 mesothelioma cases and 890 control subjects with pancreatic cancer showed that the odds of mesothelioma decreased approximately 6.3% for every 10 km farther from the nearest asbestos source, an odds ratio of 0.937 (95% confidence interval = 0.895-0.982), adjusted for age, sex, and occupational exposure to asbestos. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the hypothesis that residential proximity to NOA is significantly associated with increased risk of MM in California.
Authors: D Howel; A Gibbs; L Arblaster; L Swinburne; M Schweiger; E Renvoize; P Hatton; F Pooley Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: A Agudo; C A González; M J Bleda; J Ramírez; S Hernández; F López; A Calleja; R Panadès; D Turuguet; A Escolar; M Beltrán; J E González-Moya Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Y Iwatsubo; J C Pairon; C Boutin; O Ménard; N Massin; D Caillaud; E Orlowski; F Galateau-Salle; J Bignon; P Brochard Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1998-07-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Abdurrahman Abakay; Abdullah Cetin Tanrikulu; Mustafa Ayhan; Mehmet Sefik Imamoglu; Mahsuk Taylan; Muhammet Ali Kaplan; Ozlem Abakay Journal: Environ Health Prev Med Date: 2015-12-21 Impact factor: 3.674
Authors: Mehmet Bayram; Isa Dongel; Ali Akbaş; Ismail Benli; Muhammed Emin Akkoyunlu; Nur Dilek Bakan Journal: Lung Date: 2013-10-30 Impact factor: 2.584
Authors: Michele Carbone; Bevan H Ly; Ronald F Dodson; Ian Pagano; Paul T Morris; Umran A Dogan; Adi F Gazdar; Harvey I Pass; Haining Yang Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 6.384