Literature DB >> 15975961

Hormesis and dose-response-mediated mechanisms in carcinogenesis: evidence for a threshold in carcinogenicity of non-genotoxic carcinogens.

Shoji Fukushima1, Anna Kinoshita, Rawiwan Puatanachokchai, Masahiko Kushida, Hideki Wanibuchi, Keiichirou Morimura.   

Abstract

Recently the idea of hormesis, a biphasic dose-response relationship in which a chemical exerts opposite effects dependent on the dose, has attracted interest in the field of carcinogenesis. With non-genotoxic agents there is considerable experimental evidence in support of hormesis and the present review highlights current knowledge of dose-response effects. In particular, several in vivo studies have provided support for the idea that non-genotoxic carcinogens may inhibit hepatocarcinogenesis at low doses. Here, we survey the examples and discuss possible mechanisms of hormesis using phenobarbital, 1,1-bis(p-chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethane (DDT), alpha-benzene hexachloride (alpha-BHC) and other non-genotoxins. Furthermore, the effects of low and high doses of non-genotoxic and genotoxic compounds on carcinogenesis are compared, with especial attention to differences in mechanisms of action in animals and possible application of the dose-response concept to cancer risk assessment in humans. Epigenetic processes differentially can be affected by agents that impinge on oxidative stress, DNA repair, cell proliferation, apoptosis, intracellular communication and cell signaling. Non-genotoxic carcinogens may target nuclear receptors, cause aberrant DNA methylation at the genomic level and induce post-translational modifications at the protein level, thereby impacting on the stability or activity of key regulatory proteins, including oncoproteins and tumor suppressor proteins. Genotoxic agents, in contrast, cause genetic change by directly attacking DNA and inducing mutations, in addition to temporarily modulating the gene activity. Carcinogens can elicit a variety of changes via multiple genetic and epigenetic lesions, contributing to cellular carcinogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15975961     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgi160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  22 in total

1.  A perspective on the scientific, philosophical, and policy dimensions of hormesis.

Authors:  George R Hoffmann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  A model of cytotoxic dose-response nonlinearities arising from adaptive cell inventory management in tissues.

Authors:  Louis Anthony Tony Cox
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Changing the Risk Paradigms Can be Good for Our Health: J-Shaped, Linear and Threshold Dose-Response Models.

Authors:  P F Ricci; S R Straja; A L Cox
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Recognizing the importance of exposure-dose-response dynamics for ecotoxicity assessment: nitrofurazone-induced antioxidase activity and mRNA expression in model protozoan Euplotes vannus.

Authors:  Yazhen Hong; Shuxing Liu; Xiaofeng Lin; Jiqiu Li; Zhenzhen Yi; Khaled A S Al-Rasheid
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  What is Xenohormesis?

Authors:  Joseph A Baur; David A Sinclair
Journal:  Am J Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2008-03-31

6.  Sigma receptors [σRs]: biology in normal and diseased states.

Authors:  Colin G Rousseaux; Stephanie F Greene
Journal:  J Recept Signal Transduct Res       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.092

7.  Further evidence against a direct genotoxic mode of action for arsenic-induced cancer.

Authors:  Catherine B Klein; Joanna Leszczynska; Christina Hickey; Toby G Rossman
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 4.219

8.  Demonstration of an adaptive response to preconditioning Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) to sublethal doses of spinosad: a hormetic-dose response.

Authors:  Youhui Gong; Baoyun Xu; Youjun Zhang; Xiwu Gao; Qingjun Wu
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 9.  Oxidative-dependent integration of signal transduction with intercellular gap junctional communication in the control of gene expression.

Authors:  Brad L Upham; James E Trosko
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 10.  Hormesis in Health and Chronic Diseases.

Authors:  Xin Li; Tingting Yang; Zheng Sun
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 12.015

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.