Literature DB >> 1597465

The efficiency of promoter clearance distinguishes T7 class II and class III promoters.

R A Ikeda1.   

Abstract

Promoter strength has been defined as the relative production of transcripts from a promoter. For T7 transcription it has frequently been observed that T7 class III promoters are qualitatively stronger than T7 class II promoters. In previous work it was observed that the maximum rates of initiation of three class III and three class II promoters show no class distinctions (Ikeda, R. A., Lin, A. C., and Clarke, J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 2640-2649). This suggests that the efficiency of the conversion of the polymerase initiation complex to a stable transcription complex contributes to the overall strength of T7 promoters. The class differences in the strengths of T7 class II and class III promoters are confirmed by measuring the relative synthesis of run-off transcripts. These results show that the relative strengths of the class III promoters, phi 6.5, phi 10, and phi 13, are all comparable ranging from 0.61 for phi 6.5 to 1.00 for phi 10, while the relative strengths of the T7 class II promoters, phi 1.1B, phi 1.3, and phi 3.8, vary widely. One T7 class II promoter, phi 1.1B (relative strength = 0.34), approaches the strength of the class III promoters, while the other T7 class II promoters, phi 1.3 (relative strength = 0.045) and phi 3.8 (relative strength = 0.070) are nearly inactive. The efficiency of promoter clearance is then determined by measuring the relative production of small transcription products in comparison with the production of run-off transcripts. These measurements clearly distinguish the T7 class III promoters from the T7 class II promoters. It is found that 68-75% of all initiations at the T7 class III promoters phi 6.5, phi 10, and phi 13 produce a run-off transcript, while only 16-36% of the initiations at the T7 class II promoters phi 1.1B, phi 1.3, and phi 3.8 produce a run-off transcript. Clearly, promoter clearance contributes to the difference in promoter strengths of the T7 class II and III promoters.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1597465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  9 in total

1.  Computation, prediction, and experimental tests of fitness for bacteriophage T7 mutants with permuted genomes.

Authors:  D Endy; L You; J Yin; I J Molineux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A mutation in T7 RNA polymerase that facilitates promoter clearance.

Authors:  Jean Guillerez; Pascal J Lopez; Florence Proux; Hélène Launay; Marc Dreyfus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Relative Strengths of Promoters Provided by Common Mobile Genetic Elements Associated with Resistance Gene Expression in Gram-Negative Bacteria.

Authors:  Muhammad Kamruzzaman; Jason D Patterson; Shereen Shoma; Andrew N Ginn; Sally R Partridge; Jonathan R Iredell
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  An integrated workflow for phenazine-modifying enzyme characterization.

Authors:  R Cameron Coates; Benjamin P Bowen; Ernst Oberortner; Linda Thomashow; Michalis Hadjithomas; Zhiying Zhao; Jing Ke; Leslie Silva; Katherine Louie; Gaoyan Wang; David Robinson; Angela Tarver; Matthew Hamilton; Andrea Lubbe; Meghan Feltcher; Jeffery L Dangl; Amrita Pati; David Weller; Trent R Northen; Jan-Fang Cheng; Nigel J Mouncey; Samuel Deutsch; Yasuo Yoshikuni
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Correlating Transcription Initiation and Conformational Changes by a Single-Subunit RNA Polymerase with Near Base-Pair Resolution.

Authors:  Hye Ran Koh; Rahul Roy; Maria Sorokina; Guo-Qing Tang; Divya Nandakumar; Smita S Patel; Taekjip Ha
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  C3P3-G1: first generation of a eukaryotic artificial cytoplasmic expression system.

Authors:  Philippe H Jaïs; Etienne Decroly; Eric Jacquet; Marine Le Boulch; Aurélien Jaïs; Olivier Jean-Jean; Heather Eaton; Prishila Ponien; Fréderique Verdier; Bruno Canard; Sergio Goncalves; Stéphane Chiron; Maude Le Gall; Patrick Mayeux; Maya Shmulevitz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Comparative analysis of tandem T7-like promoter containing regions in enterobacterial genomes reveals a novel group of genetic islands.

Authors:  Zehua Chen; Thomas D Schneider
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Single-Cell Isolation and Gene Analysis: Pitfalls and Possibilities.

Authors:  Kjetil Hodne; Finn-Arne Weltzien
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  A phage-based assay for the rapid, quantitative, and single CFU visualization of E. coli (ECOR #13) in drinking water.

Authors:  Troy C Hinkley; Sangita Singh; Spencer Garing; Anne-Laure M Le Ny; Kevin P Nichols; Joseph E Peters; Joey N Talbert; Sam R Nugen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.