Literature DB >> 15974491

Deqi sensation between the acupuncture-experienced and the naïve: a Korean study II.

Jongbae Park1, Hijoon Park, Hyangsook Lee, Sabina Lim, Kyooseok Ahn, Hyejung Lee.   

Abstract

Previous experience of acupuncture is believed to affect people's expectation of future treatments. Therefore, subjects who have had acupuncture are generally excluded from sham-controlled acupuncture clinical trials. However, this assumption has not been proven, but just accepted because of the lack of evidence to the contrary. To investigate the difference in frequency and intensity of acupuncture sensation between subjects who have had acupuncture and those who have not, 36 acupuncture-experienced subjects were invited to take part in the study. After informed consent was obtained, participants were asked to complete the acupuncture sensation scale (ASS) according to what they expected needling to feel like. The needling was done at the left Hegu (LI 4) point and consisted of insertion, stimulation for 30 seconds and removal. After needling, the subjects were asked to complete the same ASS according to what they actually experienced. Adverse events were monitored. The frequency of each sensation expected and experienced, as well as acupuncture sensation scores were compared. More than 60% of the subjects expected to feel sensations of penetrating (87.6% to 100%), aching (71.2% to 95.5%), tingling (87.6% to 100%), pricking (79.7% to 99.2%) and throbbing (64.2% to 91.4%). In fact, the subjects experienced sharp (60.9% to 89.1%), intense (60.9% to 89.1%), radiating (71.2% to 95.5%) and heavy (74.8% to 97.4%) sensations just as much. The subjects expected more hurting (p = 0.001), tingling (p < 0.001), pricking (p = 0.010), stinging (p = 0.012), burning (p = 0.001) and pulsing (p = 0.009) than they experienced, while more heaviness (p = 0.011) was experienced than expected. The same outcome measures were also compared between experienced and naive groups. Apart from the fact that the acupuncture-experienced participants expected to feel pricking (p = 0.030) and stinging (p = 0.002), and experienced hurting (p = 0.022) and stinging (p = 0.028) significantly less than those who had not had acupuncture before, there was no significant difference between first time and experienced subjects. The results indicate that previous experience does not affect the people's expectation and does not hinder people from experiencing Deqi. In addition, a constellation of Deqi-related acupuncture-specific sensations is more than just a general pain intensity dimension, which requires a biochemical and physiological exploration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15974491     DOI: 10.1142/S0192415X0500293X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Chin Med        ISSN: 0192-415X            Impact factor:   4.667


  32 in total

1.  Characterization of de qi with electroacupuncture at acupoints with different properties.

Authors:  Kehua Zhou; Jiliang Fang; Xiaoling Wang; Yin Wang; Yang Hong; Jun Liu; Lei Wang; Chao Xue; Ping Wang; Baoyan Liu; Bing Zhu
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 2.579

2.  Two sets of acupoint combination of similar functions engage shared neural representation: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Ling Zhao; Wei Qin; Ji-xin Liu; Li Fang; Ming-hao Dong; Fu-wen Zhang; Cui Jiang; Jin-bo Sun; Karen M von Deneen; Fan-rong Liang
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 1.978

3.  Acupuncture for Symptomatic Treatment of Fatigue in Parkinson's Disease: Trial Design and Implementation.

Authors:  Lisa Corbin; Rebecca Childs; Caitlin Dilli; Mary K Christian; Ban Wong; Daisy Dong-Cedar; Benzi M Kluger
Journal:  Med Acupunct       Date:  2016-08-01

4.  Acupuncture sensation during ultrasound guided acupuncture needling.

Authors:  Jongbae J Park; Margeaux Akazawa; Jaeki Ahn; Selena Beckman-Harned; Feng-Chang Lin; Kwangjae Lee; Jason Fine; Robert T Davis; Helene Langevin
Journal:  Acupunct Med       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 5.  Factors contributing to therapeutic effects evaluated in acupuncture clinical trials.

Authors:  Guang-Xia Shi; Xiao-Min Yang; Cun-Zhi Liu; Lin-Peng Wang
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 6.  A literature review of de qi in clinical studies.

Authors:  Ji-Eun Park; Yeon-Hee Ryu; Yan Liu; Hee-Jung Jung; Ae-Ran Kim; So-Young Jung; Sun-Mi Choi
Journal:  Acupunct Med       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.267

7.  What Is the de-qi-Related Pattern of BOLD Responses? A Review of Acupuncture Studies in fMRI.

Authors:  Jinbo Sun; Yuanqiang Zhu; Yang Yang; Lingmin Jin; Karen M von Deneen; Wei Qin; Jie Tian
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.629

8.  Acupuncture de qi in stable somatosensory stroke patients: relations with effective brain network for motor recovery.

Authors:  Lijun Bai; Fangyuan Cui; Yihuai Zou; Lixing Lao
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  Prevalence and Correlates of Discomfort and Acceptability of Acupuncture among Outpatients in Chinese Acupuncture and Moxibustion Departments: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Baoyan Liu; Huanfang Xu; Shengnan Guo; Jiani Wu; Jia Liu; Min Yee Lim; Zhishun Liu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  Visualized characterization for cerebral response of acupuncture deqi: paradox underway.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Ming-Xiao Yang; Fang Zeng; Xi Wu; Jiao Chen; Yan-Qin Liu; Yue Feng; Fan-Rong Liang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.