Literature DB >> 15973948

A prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial of autogenous bone versus beta-tricalcium phosphate graft alone for bilateral sinus elevation: histologic and histomorphometric evaluation.

György Szabó1, Luc Huys, Paul Coulthard, Carlo Maiorana, Umberto Garagiola, József Barabás, Zsolt Németh, Károly Hrabák, Zsuzsanna Suba.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Two different graft materials, beta-tricalcium phosphate (Cerasorb) and autogenous bone, were used in the same patient. The objective was to determine whether donor site morbidity could be avoided by using pure-phase beta-tricalcium phosphate (Cerasorb).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bilateral sinus grafting was performed on 20 selected patients; Cerasorb was used on the experimental side, and autogenous bone was used on the control side. In each patient, one side was randomly designated the experimental side. In 10 of the 20 patients, the maxilla reconstruction included sinus grafting and onlay bone grafting. Implants were placed 6 months after the procedure. In addition to routine panoramic radiographs, in 10 of the 20 patients, 2- and 3-dimensional computerized tomographic examinations were performed pre- and postoperatively and after implantation. Eighty bone biopsy specimens were taken at the time of implant placement.
RESULTS: Histologically and histomorphometrically, there was no significant difference between the experimental and control grafts in terms of the quantity and rate of ossification. For each histologic sample, the total surface area, the surface area that consisted of bone, and the surface area that consisted of graft material were measured in mm2, and bone and graft material were analyzed as percentages of the total. The mean percentage bone areas were 36.47% +/- 6.9% and 38.34% +/- 7.4%, respectively; the difference was not significant (P = .25). DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: Comparisons with other studies reveal that beta-tricalcium phosphate (Cerasorb) is a satisfactory graft material, even without autogenous bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15973948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  26 in total

Review 1.  [Regeneration instead of reparation: a critical review of the autogenous bone transplant as "golden standard" of reconstructive oral surgery].

Authors:  Hans-Henning Horch; Christoph Pautke
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-07

2.  Three-dimensional volumetric changes of 5 different bone grafts in human maxillary sinuses reconstruction: a randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Juliana Dreyer Menezes; Rodrigo Dos Santos Pereira; Anderson Maikon de Souza Santos; Natália Barbosa de Siqueira; Fernanda Brasil Daura Jorge Boos-Lima; Eduardo Hochuli-Vieira
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-03-13

3.  Biocompatibility of individually designed scaffolds with human periosteum for use in tissue engineering.

Authors:  Stephan T Becker; Timothy Douglas; Yahya Acil; Hermann Seitz; Sureshan Sivananthan; Jörg Wiltfang; Patrick H Warnke
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Beta-tricalcium phosphate/type I collagen cones with or without a barrier membrane in human extraction socket healing: clinical, histologic, histomorphometric, and immunohistochemical evaluation.

Authors:  Bozidar M B Brkovic; Hari S Prasad; Michael D Rohrer; George Konandreas; George Agrogiannis; Dragana Antunovic; George K B Sándor
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Maxillary sinus floor augmentation on humans: Packing simulations and 8 months histomorphometric comparative study of anorganic bone matrix and β-tricalcium phosphate particles as grafting materials.

Authors:  A Martinez; J Franco; E Saiz; F Guitian
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 7.328

Review 6.  A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives.

Authors:  Danilo Alessio Di Stefano; Francesco Orlando; Marco Ottobelli; Davide Fiori; Umberto Garagiola
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-07-12

Review 7.  Relative performance of various biomaterials used for maxillary sinus augmentation: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bálint Trimmel; Noémi Gede; Péter Hegyi; Zsolt Szakács; Gyöngyi Anna Mezey; Eszter Varga; Márton Kivovics; Lilla Hanák; Zoltán Rumbus; György Szabó
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials.

Authors:  Jörg Handschel; Melani Simonowska; Christian Naujoks; Rita A Depprich; Michelle A Ommerborn; Ulrich Meyer; Norbert R Kübler
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.151

9.  Simultaneous sinus lifting and alveolar distraction of a severely atrophic posterior maxilla for oral rehabilitation with dental implants.

Authors:  Takahiro Kanno; Masaharu Mitsugi; Jun-Young Paeng; Shintaro Sukegawa; Yoshihiko Furuki; Hiroyuki Ohwada; Yoshiki Nariai; Hiroaki Ishibashi; Hideaki Katsuyama; Joji Sekine
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-06-25

10.  Dentin dysplasia type I: a challenge for treatment with dental implants.

Authors:  Rita A Depprich; Michelle A Ommerborn; Jörg G K Handschel; Christian D Naujoks; Ulrich Meyer; Norbert R Kübler
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 2.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.