Literature DB >> 15973946

Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure.

Young-Taeg Sul1, Carina Johansson, Ann Wennerberg, Lee-Ra Cho, Beom-Seok Chang, Tomas Albrektsson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate detailed surface characterization of oxidized implants in a newly invented electrolyte system and to determine optimal surface oxide properties to enhance the bone response in rabbits.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 screw-type titanium implants were prepared and divided into 1 control group (machine-turned implants) and 4 test groups (magnesium ion-incorporated oxidized implants). Forty implants were used for surface analyses. A total of 60 implants, 12 implants from each group, were placed in the tibiae of 10 New Zealand white rabbits and measured with a removal torque test after a healing period of 6 weeks.
RESULTS: For the test groups, the oxide thicknesses ranged from about 1,000 to 5,800 nm; for the control group, mean oxide thickness was about 17 nm. The surface morphology showed porous structures for test groups and nonporous barrier film for the control group. Pore diameter ranged from < or = 0.5 microm to < or = 3.0 microm. In regard to surface roughness, arithmetic average height deviation (Sa) values varied from 0.68 to 0.98 microm for test implants and 0.55 microm for control implants; developed surface ratio (Sdr) values ranged from 10.6% to 46% for the test groups and were about 10.6% for the control group. A mixture of anatase and rutile-type crystals were observed in the test groups; amorphous-type crystals were observed in the control group. After a healing period of 6 weeks, removal torque measurements in all 4 test groups demonstrated significantly greater implant integration as compared to machine-turned control implants (P < or = .033). DISCUSSION: Determinant oxide properties of oxidized implants are discussed in association with bone responses. Of all surface properties, RTVs were linearly increased as relative atomic concentrations of magnesium ion increase.
CONCLUSIONS: Surface properties of the oxidized implants in the present study, especially surface chemistry, influenced bone responses. The surface chemistry of the optimal oxidized implant should be composed of approximately 9% magnesium at relative atomic concentration in titanium oxide matrix and have an oxide thickness of approximately 1,000 to 5,000 nm, a porosity of about 24%, and a surface roughness of about 0.8 microm in Sa and 27% to 46% in Sdr; its oxide crystal structure should be a mixture of anatase- and rutile-phase crystals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15973946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  33 in total

Review 1.  Nanoscale surface modifications of medically relevant metals: state-of-the art and perspectives.

Authors:  Fabio Variola; John B Brunski; Giovanna Orsini; Paulo Tambasco de Oliveira; Rima Wazen; Antonio Nanci
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 7.790

2.  Nucleation and growth of calcium phosphates in the presence of fibrinogen on titanium implants with four potentially bioactive surface preparations. An in vitro study.

Authors:  Anna Arvidsson; Fredrik Currie; Per Kjellin; Young-Taeg Sul; Victoria Stenport
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Electrical polarization of titanium surfaces for the enhancement of osteoblast differentiation.

Authors:  Rolando A Gittens; Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Robert Rettew; Robert J Butera; Faisal M Alamgir; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.010

Review 4.  Multi-Scale Surface Treatments of Titanium Implants for Rapid Osseointegration: A Review.

Authors:  Qingge Wang; Peng Zhou; Shifeng Liu; Shokouh Attarilar; Robin Lok-Wang Ma; Yinsheng Zhong; Liqiang Wang
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.076

5.  The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation.

Authors:  Rolando A Gittens; Taylor McLachlan; Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Ye Cai; Simon Berner; Rina Tannenbaum; Zvi Schwartz; Kenneth H Sandhage; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Inflammatory cytokine release is affected by surface morphology and chemistry of titanium implants.

Authors:  Anna-Karin Östberg; Ulf Dahlgren; Young-Taeg Sul; Carina B Johansson
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Stability of plasma electrolytic oxidation coating on titanium in artificial saliva.

Authors:  E Matykina; R Arrabal; M Mohedano; A Pardo; M C Merino; E Rivero
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Modification of titanium alloys surface properties by plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) and influence on biological response.

Authors:  Mónica Echeverry-Rendón; Oscar Galvis; Robinson Aguirre; Sara Robledo; Juan Guillermo Castaño; Félix Echeverría
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 9.  Animal models for periodontal regeneration and peri-implant responses.

Authors:  Alpdogan Kantarci; Hatice Hasturk; Thomas E Van Dyke
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.589

10.  Electrochemical growth behavior, surface properties, and enhanced in vivo bone response of TiO2 nanotubes on microstructured surfaces of blasted, screw-shaped titanium implants.

Authors:  Young-Taeg Sul
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2010-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.