Literature DB >> 15973670

A population-based study of lung carcinoma in Pennsylvania: comparison of Veterans Administration and civilian populations.

Barbara G Campling1, Wei-Ting Hwang, Jiameng Zhang, Stephanie Thompson, Leslie A Litzky, Anil Vachani, Ilene M Rosen, Kenneth M Algazy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung carcinoma remains the major cause of cancer death in North America and is even more common among military veterans. The objective of this study was to determine whether there were differences in the characteristics and survival of Pennsylvania patients with lung carcinoma in the Veterans Administration (VA) hospital system compared with patients in the rest of the state.
METHODS: The Pennsylvania Cancer Registry was used to identify all patients who were diagnosed with lung carcinoma in the State of Pennsylvania from 1995 to 1999. Patients who were treated within the Veterans Administration Health Care Network were identified by hospital code. Survival from the date of diagnosis of lung carcinoma was determined by using the Pennsylvania state mortality files from 1995 to 2001.
RESULTS: From 1995 to 1999, 48,994 patients were newly diagnosed with lung carcinoma in Pennsylvania (41.2% women), including 856 patients in the VA system (6 women). The current analysis was restricted to male patients (n = 28,798 men). There was no major difference in age of VA patients compared with non-VA patients, and the proportions of patients who had localized or regional stage disease were similar (49% of VA patients vs. 48% of non-VA patients). The proportion of black patients was much higher in the VA population (23%) compared with the non-VA population (9%). The median survival was 6.3 months for VA patients compared with 7.9 months for patients in the rest of the state, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 12% for VA patients compared with 15% for patients in the rest of the state. When survival was analyzed according to race, there was a significant difference in the age-adjusted survival of white patients in the VA system compared with patients in the rest of the state (P = 0.0007), but no significant difference was observed among black patients (P = 0.92).
CONCLUSIONS: The overall survival of VA patients with lung carcinoma in Pennsylvania was inferior to that of patients in the remainder of the state and this was due primarily to differences in survival among the white patients. Further investigation will be necessary to determine whether this disparity was caused by differences in socioeconomic status or comorbidities or whether there are systematic differences in the diagnosis, staging, or treatment of lung carcinoma between VA patients and civilian patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15973670     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  12 in total

1.  Attitudes and beliefs toward lung cancer screening among US Veterans.

Authors:  Nichole T Tanner; Leonard E Egede; Clayton Shamblin; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Gerard A Silvestri
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Patterns of care and survival for glioblastoma patients in the Veterans population.

Authors:  Robert T Arrigo; Maxwell Boakye; Stephen L Skirboll
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  Comparing VA and Non-VA Quality of Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Claire O'Hanlon; Christina Huang; Elizabeth Sloss; Rebecca Anhang Price; Peter Hussey; Carrie Farmer; Courtney Gidengil
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Uptake of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Resections Within the Veterans Affairs for Known or Suspected Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Amelia W Maiga; Stephen A Deppen; Jason Denton; Michael E Matheny; Erin A Gillaspie; Jonathan C Nesbitt; Eric L Grogan
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Poor survival for veterans with pathologic stage I non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jamii B St Julien; Rhonda Pinkerman; Melinda C Aldrich; Heidi Chen; Stephen A Deppen; Carol Callaway-Lane; Pierre Massion; Joe B Putnam; Eric S Lambright; Jonathan C Nesbitt; Eric L Grogan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Patient preference and contraindications in measuring quality of care: what do administrative data miss?

Authors:  Joan J Ryoo; Diana L Ordin; Anna Liza M Antonio; Sabine M Oishi; Michael K Gould; Steven M Asch; Jennifer L Malin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Germline mutations and age at onset of lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Karen L Reckamp; Carolyn E Behrendt; Thomas P Slavin; Stacy W Gray; Danielle K Castillo; Marianna Koczywas; Mihaela C Cristea; Kirsten M Babski; Donna Stearns; Catherine A Marcum; Yenni P Rodriguez; Amie J Hass; Mary M Vecchio; Pamela Mora; Aleck E Cervantes; Sharon R Sand; Rosa M Mejia; Terrence C Tsou; Ravi Salgia; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 6.921

Review 8.  Lung and colorectal cancer treatment and outcomes in the Veterans Affairs health care system.

Authors:  Leah L Zullig; Christina D Williams; Alice G Fortune-Britt
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Detection of early lung cancer among military personnel (DECAMP) consortium: study protocols.

Authors:  Ehab Billatos; Fenghai Duan; Elizabeth Moses; Helga Marques; Irene Mahon; Lindsey Dymond; Charles Apgar; Denise Aberle; George Washko; Avrum Spira
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.317

10.  Veterans Affairs Insurance Disparities for Metastatic Lung Cancer in the Hawaiian Islands.

Authors:  John Q Lin; Shirley Q Li; Todd A Pezzi; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Clifton D Fuller; Aileen B Chen; Bruce D Minsky; David L Schwartz; Brenda Y Hernandez; Stephen G Chun
Journal:  JTO Clin Res Rep       Date:  2020-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.