Literature DB >> 15972245

A cost-effectiveness analysis of heroin detoxification methods in the Australian National Evaluation of Pharmacotherapies for Opioid Dependence (NEPOD).

M D Shanahan1, C M Doran, E Digiusto, J Bell, N Lintzeris, J White, R Ali, J B Saunders, R P Mattick, S Gilmour.   

Abstract

This economic evaluation was part of the Australian National Evaluation of Pharmacotherapies for Opioid Dependence (NEPOD) project. Data from four trials of heroin detoxification methods, involving 365 participants, were pooled to enable a comprehensive comparison of the cost-effectiveness of five inpatient and outpatient detoxification methods. This study took the perspective of the treatment provider in assessing resource use and costs. Two short-term outcome measures were used-achievement of an initial 7-day period of abstinence, and entry into ongoing post-detoxification treatment. The mean costs of the various detoxification methods ranged widely, from AUD 491 dollars(buprenorphine-based outpatient); to AUD 605 dollars for conventional outpatient; AUD 1404 dollars for conventional inpatient; AUD 1990 dollars for rapid detoxification under sedation; and to AUD 2689 dollars for anaesthesia per episode. An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out using conventional outpatient detoxification as the base comparator. The buprenorphine-based outpatient detoxification method was found to be the most cost-effective method overall, and rapid opioid detoxification under sedation was the most cost-effective inpatient method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15972245     DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Behav        ISSN: 0306-4603            Impact factor:   3.913


  6 in total

Review 1.  Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2006.

Authors:  Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  Costs of addressing heroin addiction in Malaysia and 32 comparable countries worldwide.

Authors:  Jennifer Prah Ruger; Marek Chawarski; Mahmud Mazlan; Craig Luekens; Nora Ng; Richard Schottenfeld
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Economic evaluation of interventions to treat opiate dependence : a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Christopher M Doran
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Cost-effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for cocaine and alcohol abuse among women: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer Prah Ruger; Jennifer Prah Ruger; Arbi Ben Abdallah; Craig Luekens; Linda Cottler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cost-effectiveness of buprenorphine and naltrexone treatments for heroin dependence in Malaysia.

Authors:  Jennifer Prah Ruger; Marek Chawarski; Mahmud Mazlan; Nora Ng; Richard Schottenfeld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) of cannabinoid replacement therapy (Nabiximols) for the management of treatment-resistant cannabis dependent patients: a study protocol.

Authors:  Anjali K Bhardwaj; David J Allsop; Jan Copeland; Iain S McGregor; Adrian Dunlop; Marian Shanahan; Raimondo Bruno; Nghi Phung; Mark Montebello; Craig Sadler; Jessica Gugusheff; Melissa Jackson; Jennifer Luksza; Nicholas Lintzeris
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.630

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.