Literature DB >> 15972212

Comparison of biophysical stimuli for mechano-regulation of tissue differentiation during fracture healing.

Hanna Isaksson1, Wouter Wilson, Corrinus C van Donkelaar, Rik Huiskes, Keita Ito.   

Abstract

Most long-bone fractures heal through indirect or secondary fracture healing, a complex process in which endochondral ossification is an essential part and bone is regenerated by tissue differentiation. This process is sensitive to the mechanical environment, and several authors have proposed mechano-regulation algorithms to describe it using strain, pore pressure and/or interstitial fluid velocity as biofeedback variables. The aim of this study was to compare various mechano-regulation algorithms' abilities to describe normal fracture healing in one computational model. Additionally, we hypothesized that tissue differentiation during normal fracture healing could be equally well regulated by the individual mechanical stimuli, e.g. deviatoric strain, pore pressure or fluid velocity. A biphasic finite element model of an ovine tibia with a 3mm fracture gap and callus was used to simulate the course of tissue differentiation during normal fracture healing. The load applied was regulated in a biofeedback loop, where the load magnitude was determined by the interfragmentary movement in the fracture gap. All the previously published mechano-regulation algorithms studied, simulated the course of normal fracture healing correctly. They predicted (1) intramembranous bone formation along the periosteum and callus tip, (2) endochondral ossification within the external callus and cortical gap, and (3) creeping substitution of bone towards the gap from the initial lateral osseous bridge. Some differences between the effects of the algorithms were seen, but they were not significant. None of the volumetric components, i.e. pore pressure or fluid velocity, alone were able to correctly predict spatial or temporal tissue distribution during fracture healing. However, simulation as a function of only deviatoric strain accurately predicted the course of normal fracture healing. This suggests that the deviatoric component may be the most significant mechanical parameter to guide tissue differentiation during indirect fracture healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15972212     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.01.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  42 in total

Review 1.  Craniofacial tissue engineering by stem cells.

Authors:  J J Mao; W V Giannobile; J A Helms; S J Hollister; P H Krebsbach; M T Longaker; S Shi
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Prediction of fracture healing under axial loading, shear loading and bending is possible using distortional and dilatational strains as determining mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  Malte Steiner; Lutz Claes; Anita Ignatius; Frank Niemeyer; Ulrich Simon; Tim Wehner
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Deciphering mechanical regulation of chondrogenesis in fibrin-polyurethane composite scaffolds enriched with human mesenchymal stem cells: a dual computational and experimental approach.

Authors:  Houman Zahedmanesh; Martin Stoddart; Patrick Lezuo; Christoph Forkmann; Markus A Wimmmer; Mauro Alini; Hans Van Oosterwyck
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  The connection between cellular mechanoregulation and tissue patterns during bone healing.

Authors:  Felix Repp; Andreas Vetter; Georg N Duda; Richard Weinkamer
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  [Mechanobiology of fracture healing part 2 : Relevance for internal fixation of fractures].

Authors:  L Claes
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Mechanobiological simulations of peri-acetabular bone ingrowth: a comparative analysis of cell-phenotype specific and phenomenological algorithms.

Authors:  Kaushik Mukherjee; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Cartilage to bone transformation during fracture healing is coordinated by the invading vasculature and induction of the core pluripotency genes.

Authors:  Diane P Hu; Federico Ferro; Frank Yang; Aaron J Taylor; Wenhan Chang; Theodore Miclau; Ralph S Marcucio; Chelsea S Bahney
Journal:  Development       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Mechanically induced osteogenic differentiation--the role of RhoA, ROCKII and cytoskeletal dynamics.

Authors:  Emily J Arnsdorf; Padmaja Tummala; Ronald Y Kwon; Christopher R Jacobs
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 9.  Mechanotransduction and fracture repair.

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Ryan E Gleason; Lauren N M Hayward; Pui L Leong; Kristy T Salisbury Palomares
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Bone defects following curettage do not necessarily need augmentation.

Authors:  Martti Hirn; Uday de Silva; Sujith Sidharthan; Robert J Grimer; Adesegun Abudu; Roger M Tillman; Simon R Carter
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.