BACKGROUND: The use of radioactive compounds for sentinel node biopsy is now a generally accepted part of the surgical treatment of breast cancer and melanoma, with the risk of radiation exposure to the operating team. The aim of this investigation was to study the levels of this exposure in relation to the permissible radiation dose limits. METHODS: The radiation exposure to the hands and bodies of the operating surgeons (the 'risk persons') was measured by thermoluminescent dosimeters in 79 operations and to the pathologists handling the specimens in 17 cases. Radioactivity and dose rate measurement from tumours and breast specimens were also performed. RESULTS: During an operation the mean skin dose (+/-SD) to the thermoluminescent dosimeters placed at the hand and the abdominal wall were 0.04 +/- 0.04 mSv (79 operations) and 0.01 +/- 0.02 mSv (67 operations) respectively. For the pathologist, the mean hand dose per operation was below the detection limit (17 operations). Correlation between the measured dose rate and the radioactive content of the tumours was 0.998. CONCLUSIONS: The radiation exposure to the staff involved in sentinel node (SN) biopsy for breast cancer using radioactive labelled tracers will be considerably below the permissible limits, even with high numbers of SN biopsy procedures. Pregnant staff members should participate in <100 SN operations.
BACKGROUND: The use of radioactive compounds for sentinel node biopsy is now a generally accepted part of the surgical treatment of breast cancer and melanoma, with the risk of radiation exposure to the operating team. The aim of this investigation was to study the levels of this exposure in relation to the permissible radiation dose limits. METHODS: The radiation exposure to the hands and bodies of the operating surgeons (the 'risk persons') was measured by thermoluminescent dosimeters in 79 operations and to the pathologists handling the specimens in 17 cases. Radioactivity and dose rate measurement from tumours and breast specimens were also performed. RESULTS: During an operation the mean skin dose (+/-SD) to the thermoluminescent dosimeters placed at the hand and the abdominal wall were 0.04 +/- 0.04 mSv (79 operations) and 0.01 +/- 0.02 mSv (67 operations) respectively. For the pathologist, the mean hand dose per operation was below the detection limit (17 operations). Correlation between the measured dose rate and the radioactive content of the tumours was 0.998. CONCLUSIONS: The radiation exposure to the staff involved in sentinel node (SN) biopsy for breast cancer using radioactive labelled tracers will be considerably below the permissible limits, even with high numbers of SN biopsy procedures. Pregnant staff members should participate in <100 SN operations.
Authors: Annette H Chakera; Birger Hesse; Zeynep Burak; James R Ballinger; Allan Britten; Corrado Caracò; Alistair J Cochran; Martin G Cook; Krzysztof T Drzewiecki; Richard Essner; Einat Even-Sapir; Alexander M M Eggermont; Tanja Gmeiner Stopar; Christian Ingvar; Martin C Mihm; Stanley W McCarthy; Nicola Mozzillo; Omgo E Nieweg; Richard A Scolyer; Hans Starz; John F Thompson; Giuseppe Trifirò; Giuseppe Viale; Sergi Vidal-Sicart; Roger Uren; Wendy Waddington; Arturo Chiti; Alain Spatz; Alessandro Testori Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Christina Bluemel; Ken Herrmann; Francesco Giammarile; Omgo E Nieweg; Julien Dubreuil; Alessandro Testori; Riccardo A Audisio; Odysseas Zoras; Michael Lassmann; Annette H Chakera; Roger Uren; Sotirios Chondrogiannis; Patrick M Colletti; Domenico Rubello Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-07-25 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Stephen P Povoski; Ryan L Neff; Cathy M Mojzisik; David M O'Malley; George H Hinkle; Nathan C Hall; Douglas A Murrey; Michael V Knopp; Edward W Martin Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 2.754
Authors: R T Meades; W E Svensson; J W Frank; V Gada; G Ralleigh; K Satchithananda; N Barrett; K S Nijran Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-09-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Francesco Giammarile; Naomi Alazraki; John N Aarsvold; Riccardo A Audisio; Edwin Glass; Sandra F Grant; Jolanta Kunikowska; Marjut Leidenius; Valeria M Moncayo; Roger F Uren; Wim J G Oyen; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Sergi Vidal Sicart Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: A H Chakera; J Lock-Andersen; U Hesse; B M Nürnberg; B R Juhl; K H Stokholm; K T Drzewiecki; B Hesse Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-01-20 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: L W T Alkureishi; Z Burak; J A Alvarez; J Ballinger; A Bilde; A J Britten; L Calabrese; C Chiesa; A Chiti; R de Bree; H W Gray; K Hunter; A F Kovacs; M Lassmann; C R Leemans; G Mamelle; M McGurk; J Mortensen; T Poli; T Shoaib; P Sloan; J A Sorensen; S J Stoeckli; J B Thomsen; G Trifiro; J Werner; G L Ross Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Lee W T Alkureishi; Zeynep Burak; Julio A Alvarez; James Ballinger; Anders Bilde; Alan J Britten; Luca Calabrese; Carlo Chiesa; Arturo Chiti; Remco de Bree; Harry W Gray; Keith Hunter; Adorjan F Kovacs; Michael Lassmann; C Rene Leemans; Gerard Mamelle; Mark McGurk; Jann Mortensen; Tito Poli; Taimur Shoaib; Philip Sloan; Jens A Sorensen; Sandro J Stoeckli; Jorn B Thomsen; Giusepe Trifiro; Jochen Werner; Gary L Ross Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 9.236