Literature DB >> 15971986

Development of a zona-free method of nuclear transfer in the mouse.

R Ribas1, B Oback, W Ritchie, T Chebotareva, P Ferrier, C Clarke, J Taylor, E J Gallagher, A C Maurício, M Sousa, I Wilmut.   

Abstract

In the present study, a zona-free nuclear transfer (NT) technique, which had been originally developed in cattle, was modified for the mouse. Steps involved in this approach include removing the zona pellucida and enucleating without a holding pipette; sticking donor cells to the cytoplast before electric pulses are applied to fuse them and culturing reconstructed embryos individually in single droplets, to prevent aggregation. Control zona-free and zona-intact embryos from mated donors showed no significant difference in development to blastocyst, but did show reduced development to term. Removal of the zona pellucida affected the response to activation by strontium in the absence of calcium as a significant proportion of zona-free control oocytes and embryos reconstructed by NT lysed during this treatment. A comparison between cumulus and ES cells as donor cells revealed significant differences in fusion efficiency (58.1 +/- 4.0%, n = 573 vs. 42.9 +/- 2.2%, n = 2064, respectively, p < 0.001), cleavage (77.2 +/- 3.4%, n = 334 vs. 40.8 +/- 2.7%, n = 903, respectively, p < 0.001) but not for development to morula/blastocyst (8.7 +/- 2.1%, n = 334 vs. 13.9 +/- 1.8%, n = 903, respectively, p < 0.1). The stage at which embryo development arrested was also affected by donor cell type. A majority of embryos reconstructed from cumulus cells arrested at two-cell stage, usually with two nuclei, whereas those reconstructed from ES cells arrested at one-cell stage, usually with two pseudo-pronuclei. After transfer of ES cell-derived NT embryos, a viable cloned mouse was produced (3.0% of transferred embryos developed to term). These observations establish that a zona-free cloning approach is possible in the mouse, although further research is required to increase the efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15971986     DOI: 10.1089/clo.2005.7.126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cloning Stem Cells        ISSN: 1536-2302


  6 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of nuclear transfer embryo-derived mouse embryonic stem cells. Part I: cellular characterization.

Authors:  Julianna Kobolak; Solomon Mamo; Ruttachuk Rungsiwiwut; Olga Ujhelly; Erika Csonka; Gyula Hadlaczky; Andras Dinnyes
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 1.987

2.  High developmental potential in vitro and in vivo of cattle embryos cloned without micromanipulators.

Authors:  Lleretny Rodríguez; Felipe I Navarrete; Heribelt Tovar; José F Cox; Fidel Ovidio Castro
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Transient JMJD2B-mediated reduction of H3K9me3 levels improves reprogramming of embryonic stem cells into cloned embryos.

Authors:  Jisha Antony; Fleur Oback; Larry W Chamley; Björn Oback; Götz Laible
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 4.  Interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer and preliminary data for horse-cow/mouse iSCNT.

Authors:  R Tayfur Tecirlioglu; Jitong Guo; Alan O Trounson
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.739

5.  Correction of a Disease Mutation using CRISPR/Cas9-assisted Genome Editing in Japanese Black Cattle.

Authors:  Mitsumi Ikeda; Shuichi Matsuyama; Satoshi Akagi; Katsuhiro Ohkoshi; Sho Nakamura; Shiori Minabe; Koji Kimura; Misa Hosoe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Embryos generated from oocytes lacking complex N- and O-glycans have compromised development and implantation.

Authors:  Patricia Grasa; Heidy Kaune; Suzannah A Williams
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 3.906

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.