Literature DB >> 15971857

Assessment of DNA damage in nuclear medicine personnel--comparative study with the alkaline comet assay and the chromosome aberration test.

Nevenka Kopjar1, Vera Garaj-Vrhovac.   

Abstract

Despite much research over the last few decades, there still remains considerable uncertainty as to the genetic impact of ionizing radiation on human populations, particularly at low levels. The aim of the present study was to provide data on the genetic hazards due to occupational exposure of low doses of ionizing radiation in nuclear medicine departments. The assessment of primary DNA damage in peripheral blood leukocytes of medical staff was performed using the alkaline comet assay and the data obtained were compared with the results of conventional cytogenetic biodosimetry using the chromosome aberration (CA) test. Altogether 120 subjects (60 exposed and 60 controls) participated in the study. Statistically significant increases in primary DNA damage and increased frequencies of CAs compared to controls were observed. Within the exposed population, significant inter-individual differences in DNA damage were found, indicating differences in genome sensitivity. Age and gender were not confounding factors, while smoking enhanced the levels of primary DNA damage only in control subjects, as revealed by both biomarkers studied. The present study suggests that genotoxic damage results from exposure to chronic low doses of ionizing radiation in nuclear medicine departments. Therefore, the exposed medical personnel should carefully comply with the radiation protection procedures and should minimize radiation exposure where possible to avoid potential genotoxic effects. The results obtained in this study point to the significance of biological indicators providing information on the actual risk to the radiation exposed individuals. According to our results, the alkaline comet assay and CA test are sensitive biomarkers that can be used as additional complements to physical dosimetry for assessing exposure to radiation in nuclear medicine personnel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15971857     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2005.01.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  7 in total

1.  Effects of ionising radiation on micronucleus formation and chromosomal aberrations in Chinese radiation workers.

Authors:  Qing-Zeng Qian; Xiang-Ke Cao; Fu-Hai Shen; Qian Wang
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  Antibody-based screen for ionizing radiation-dependent changes in the Mammalian proteome for use in biodosimetry.

Authors:  Richard G Ivey; Oby Subramanian; Travis D Lorentzen; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Use of the cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay to detect gender differences and genetic instability in a lung cancer case-control study.

Authors:  Michelle K McHugh; Mirtha S Lopez; Chung-Han Ho; Margaret R Spitz; Carol J Etzel; Randa A El-Zein
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  A study of professional radiation hazards in CT scan and nuclear medicine workers using GTG-banding and solid stain.

Authors:  Vahid Changizi; Mohammad Hossein Alizadeh; Akbar Mousavi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-04-18

5.  A Novel Biological Dosimetry Method for Monitoring Occupational Radiation Exposure in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Wards: From Radiation Dosimetry to Biological Effects.

Authors:  S Heydarheydari; A Haghparast; M T Eivazi
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2016-03-01

Review 6.  The Efficacy of Periodic Complete Blood Count Tests in Evaluation of the Health Status of Radiation Workers in Iran: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Asma Zare; Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.429

7.  Assessment of Health Professionals' Attitudes on Radiation Protection Measures.

Authors:  Aspasia Goula; Athanasios Chatzis; Maria-Aggeliki Stamouli; Martha Kelesi; Evridiki Kaba; Emmanouil Brilakis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.