OBJECTIVE: To determine the distribution of A/B blood types in pedigree and crossbred cats in the Sydney region, and to estimate the associated risk of administering incompatible blood in an unmatched random transfusion. DESIGN: A prospective/retrospective study of blood specimens collected from both sick and healthy cats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood was collected from 355 cats from the Sydney region over a 12-year period from 1992 to 2003. Specimens were obtained from 187 domestic crossbred cats (short and long-haired) and 168 pedigree cats. The blood type of each cat was determined by one of three different laboratories using standard methods that varied over the duration of the survey. RESULTS: The distributions of blood types obtained by the three laboratories were not significantly different. The prevalence of type-A, type-B and type-AB blood types in crossbred cats was 62%, 36% and 1.6%, respectively. This is the highest percentage of type-B cats so far reported for an outbred population of domestic cats, and is significantly higher than the 26% reported previously for cats in the Brisbane region. The calculated frequency for the type-B allele assuming Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for this feline population is 0.60; the corresponding frequency of the type-A allele is thus approximately 0.40. The calculated proportion of random transfusions from this population giving rise to an incompatible blood transfusion is 46%, with half of these being life-threatening events. The calculated proportion of random matings from this population at risk for developing neonatal isoerythrolysis is 23%. The distribution of A and B blood types for pedigree cats was in general agreement with data reported previously for cats in North America and Europe, suggesting that the distribution of blood types in these purebred populations is relatively consistent throughout the world. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of type B cats in the owned domestic and pedigree cat population is so high that blood typing or cross matching prior to transfusion should be mandatory, except in Siamese/Oriental cats.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the distribution of A/B blood types in pedigree and crossbred cats in the Sydney region, and to estimate the associated risk of administering incompatible blood in an unmatched random transfusion. DESIGN: A prospective/retrospective study of blood specimens collected from both sick and healthy cats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood was collected from 355 cats from the Sydney region over a 12-year period from 1992 to 2003. Specimens were obtained from 187 domestic crossbred cats (short and long-haired) and 168 pedigree cats. The blood type of each cat was determined by one of three different laboratories using standard methods that varied over the duration of the survey. RESULTS: The distributions of blood types obtained by the three laboratories were not significantly different. The prevalence of type-A, type-B and type-AB blood types in crossbred cats was 62%, 36% and 1.6%, respectively. This is the highest percentage of type-B cats so far reported for an outbred population of domestic cats, and is significantly higher than the 26% reported previously for cats in the Brisbane region. The calculated frequency for the type-B allele assuming Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for this feline population is 0.60; the corresponding frequency of the type-A allele is thus approximately 0.40. The calculated proportion of random transfusions from this population giving rise to an incompatible blood transfusion is 46%, with half of these being life-threatening events. The calculated proportion of random matings from this population at risk for developing neonatal isoerythrolysis is 23%. The distribution of A and B blood types for pedigree cats was in general agreement with data reported previously for cats in North America and Europe, suggesting that the distribution of blood types in these purebred populations is relatively consistent throughout the world. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of type B cats in the owned domestic and pedigree cat population is so high that blood typing or cross matching prior to transfusion should be mandatory, except in Siamese/Oriental cats.
Authors: Catharina C Euler; Karthik Raj; Keijiro Mizukami; Louise Murray; Chi-Ya Chen; Andrew Mackin; Urs Giger Journal: Vet Clin Pathol Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 1.180
Authors: V R Barrs; U Giger; B Wilson; C T T Chan; A E Lingard; L Tran; A Seng; P J Canfield; J A Beatty Journal: Aust Vet J Date: 2009 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.281
Authors: Katrina M Morris; Katherine Kirby; Julia A Beatty; Vanessa R Barrs; Sonia Cattley; Victor David; Stephen J O'Brien; Marilyn Menotti-Raymond; Katherine Belov Journal: J Hered Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 2.645
Authors: Barbara Gandolfi; Robert A Grahn; Nicholas A Gustafson; Daniela Proverbio; Eva Spada; Badri Adhikari; Janling Cheng; Gordon Andrews; Leslie A Lyons; Chris R Helps Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Barbara Bighignoli; Tirri Niini; Robert A Grahn; Niels C Pedersen; Lee V Millon; Michele Polli; Maria Longeri; Leslie A Lyons Journal: BMC Genet Date: 2007-06-06 Impact factor: 2.797
Authors: Sandrina M Vieira; Rui R F Ferreira; Augusto Jf de Matos; Inês M Cardoso; Rita M C Graça; Ana Rpb Soares; Carles Blasi-Brugué; Ignacio M Sánchez; Rafael R Gopegui Journal: JFMS Open Rep Date: 2017-09-19