PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between temporal peritumoral enhancement and peritumoral focal fat sparing adjacent to hepatic hemangiomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On the basis of MRI and sonographic imaging follow-up, 51 hepatic hemangiomas were identified in 37 patients, who had both hepatic hemangiomas and focal fat-sparing areas in fatty liver. Among them, 36 tumors were associated with peritumoral focal fat spares. The association between the temporal peritumoral enhancement in the early arterial phase of dynamic MRI and peritumoral fat sparing in the same hemangioma was investigated. Furthermore, the configuration of the temporal peritumoral enhancement was correlated with that of the peritumoral focal fat-sparing area. We used Chi square and Fisher's exact test for statistic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 31 out of 36 hemangiomas (86.1%) showed both peritumoral focal fat spares and temporal peritumoral enhancement. The presence of temporal peritumoral enhancement is significantly related to that of peritumoral focal fat-sparing (P < 0.001). A total of 21 of the 31 tumors (67.7%) presented with similar configuration of the peritumoral focal fat-sparing area and temporal peritumoral enhancement area with respect to size and shape. The remaining 10 hemangiomas showed similar shape but slightly different size in these two imaging characteristics. CONCLUSION: Temporal peritumoral enhancement seen in hepatic hemangioma might be related to focal fatty sparing adjacent to the hemangiomas.
PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between temporal peritumoral enhancement and peritumoral focal fat sparing adjacent to hepatic hemangiomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On the basis of MRI and sonographic imaging follow-up, 51 hepatic hemangiomas were identified in 37 patients, who had both hepatic hemangiomas and focal fat-sparing areas in fatty liver. Among them, 36 tumors were associated with peritumoral focal fat spares. The association between the temporal peritumoral enhancement in the early arterial phase of dynamic MRI and peritumoral fat sparing in the same hemangioma was investigated. Furthermore, the configuration of the temporal peritumoral enhancement was correlated with that of the peritumoral focal fat-sparing area. We used Chi square and Fisher's exact test for statistic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 31 out of 36 hemangiomas (86.1%) showed both peritumoral focal fat spares and temporal peritumoral enhancement. The presence of temporal peritumoral enhancement is significantly related to that of peritumoral focal fat-sparing (P < 0.001). A total of 21 of the 31 tumors (67.7%) presented with similar configuration of the peritumoral focal fat-sparing area and temporal peritumoral enhancement area with respect to size and shape. The remaining 10 hemangiomas showed similar shape but slightly different size in these two imaging characteristics. CONCLUSION: Temporal peritumoral enhancement seen in hepatic hemangioma might be related to focal fatty sparing adjacent to the hemangiomas.