Literature DB >> 15970238

Decision-makers and the usefulness of research evidence in policy implementation--a case study from Lao PDR.

G Tomson1, C Paphassarang, K Jönsson, K Houamboun, K Akkhavong, R Wahlström.   

Abstract

The involvement of researchers in the policy process and policy-makers in research is little studied, particularly in developing countries. In 1993, the Lao National Drug Policy (NDP) was endorsed in a consultative process involving many stakeholders. Lao People's Democratic Republic is a poor country in South East Asia. Five pilot provinces were selected for implementation of the policy, which had a health system research (HSR) component. This case study explores decision-makers' knowledge and attitudes regarding the usefulness of HSR in the NDP implementation process. Ninety decision-makers from different health institutions including hospitals, medical schools and main drug suppliers were surveyed using a self-administrated structured questionnaire, filled in during a NDP conference in 2001. Results from six HSR projects related to the NDP implementation had been presented during the conference, but also 6 months previously and through written reports. There were 75 respondents (83% of attendees, 90% of whom were men), 39% with medical, 50% with pharmacy and 11% with other background. Ninety-eight percent of the participants found operational research useful, and 87% supported it to be an element of the NDP. Two-thirds knew the objectives of the NDP. There was no significant difference in knowledge and attitudes between pilot and non-pilot provinces and between professions. Ninety-two percent were aware of the Essential Drug List, and 88% found it adequate to drug need. Ninety-seven percent agreed with generic drug prescribing. Seventy percent reported to have heard about Good Pharmacy Practice (GPP), but only a few could explain it. Although most participants agreed that HSR should be one main component of the NDP and found HSR results useful, few had heard about them before the conference, and research was not well understood. The paper discusses various factors influencing decision-makers' perceptions of usefulness of research in this case during the NDP implementation process. It is concluded that the acceptance of research and major NDP concepts probably is a result of close interaction between researchers and policy-makers and that the interface between research and policy-making needs further studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15970238     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  21 in total

1.  Improving the performance of Drug and Therapeutics Committees in hospitals--a quasi-experimental study in Laos.

Authors:  Chu Vang; Goran Tomson; Sengchan Kounnavong; Thanakhanh Southammavong; Amphayvanh Phanyanouvong; Rolf Johansson; Bo Eriksson; Rolf Wahlstrom
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Diarrhoea case management in low- and middle-income countries--an unfinished agenda.

Authors:  Birger Carl Forsberg; Max G Petzold; Göran Tomson; Peter Allebeck
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Survey of Argentine health researchers on the use of evidence in policymaking.

Authors:  Adrijana Corluka; Adnan A Hyder; Elsa Segura; Peter Winch; Robert K D McLean
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Translating research into maternal health care policy: a qualitative case study of the use of evidence in policies for the treatment of eclampsia and pre-eclampsia in South Africa.

Authors:  Karen Daniels; Simon Lewin
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2008-12-17

5.  Translating research into policy: lessons learned from eclampsia treatment and malaria control in three southern African countries.

Authors:  Godfrey Woelk; Karen Daniels; Julie Cliff; Simon Lewin; Esperança Sevene; Benedita Fernandes; Alda Mariano; Sheillah Matinhure; Andrew D Oxman; John N Lavis; Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2009-12-30

6.  Evidence-informed health policy 4 - case descriptions of organizations that support the use of research evidence.

Authors:  John N Lavis; Ray Moynihan; Andrew D Oxman; Elizabeth J Paulsen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 2: Improving how your organisation supports the use of research evidence to inform policymaking.

Authors:  Andrew D Oxman; Per Olav Vandvik; John N Lavis; Atle Fretheim; Simon Lewin
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2009-12-16

8.  Exploring health systems research and its influence on policy processes in low income countries.

Authors:  Adnan A Hyder; Gerald Bloom; Melissa Leach; Shamsuzzoha B Syed; David H Peters
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Health systems research in Lao PDR: capacity development for getting research into policy and practice.

Authors:  Kristina Jönsson; Göran Tomson; Christer Jönsson; Sengchanh Kounnavong; Rolf Wahlström
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2007-10-16

Review 10.  Embedding health policy and systems research into decision-making processes in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Adam D Koon; Krishna D Rao; Nhan T Tran; Abdul Ghaffar
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2013-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.