Literature DB >> 15969801

Investigation of selected baseline removal techniques as candidates for automated implementation.

Georg Schulze1, Andrew Jirasek, Marcia M L Yu, Arnel Lim, Robin F B Turner, Michael W Blades.   

Abstract

Observed spectra normally contain spurious features along with those of interest and it is common practice to employ one of several available algorithms to remove the unwanted components. Low frequency spurious components are often referred to as 'baseline', 'background', and/or 'background noise'. Here we examine a cross-section of non-instrumental methods designed to remove background features from spectra; the particular methods considered here represent approaches with different theoretical underpinnings. We compare and evaluate their relative performance based on synthetic data sets designed to exemplify vibrational spectroscopic signals in realistic contexts and thereby assess their suitability for computer automation. Each method is presented in a modular format with a concise review of the underlying theory, along with a comparison and discussion of their strengths, weaknesses, and amenability to automation, in order to facilitate the selection of methods best suited to particular applications.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15969801     DOI: 10.1366/0003702053945985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Spectrosc        ISSN: 0003-7028            Impact factor:   2.388


  14 in total

Review 1.  Raman Sensing and Its Multimodal Combination with Optoacoustics and OCT for Applications in the Life Sciences.

Authors:  Merve Wollweber; Bernhard Roth
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Goldindec: A Novel Algorithm for Raman Spectrum Baseline Correction.

Authors:  Juntao Liu; Jianyang Sun; Xiuzhen Huang; Guojun Li; Binqiang Liu
Journal:  Appl Spectrosc       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  Imaging of plant cell walls by confocal Raman microscopy.

Authors:  Notburga Gierlinger; Tobias Keplinger; Michael Harrington
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  In vivo molecular evaluation of guinea pig skin incisions healing after surgical suture and laser tissue welding using Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  A Alimova; R Chakraverty; R Muthukattil; S Elder; A Katz; V Sriramoju; Stanley Lipper; R R Alfano
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  2009-06-14       Impact factor: 6.252

5.  Raman Labeled Nanoparticles: Characterization of Variability and Improved Method for Unmixing.

Authors:  Kranthi Kode; Cathy Shachaf; Sailaja Elchuri; Garry Nolan; David S Paik
Journal:  J Raman Spectrosc       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  Identifying the lineages of individual cells in cocultures by multivariate analysis of Raman spectra.

Authors:  Yelena Ilin; Mary L Kraft
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.616

7.  Endoscopic sensing of alveolar pH.

Authors:  D Choudhury; M G Tanner; S McAughtrie; F Yu; B Mills; T R Choudhary; S Seth; T H Craven; J M Stone; I K Mati; C J Campbell; M Bradley; C K I Williams; K Dhaliwal; T A Birks; R R Thomson
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Multi-wavelength excitation Brillouin spectroscopy.

Authors:  Maria A Troyanova-Wood; Vladislav V Yakovlev
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.653

9.  Real-time In vivo Diagnosis of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Using Rapid Fiber-Optic Raman Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Kan Lin; Wei Zheng; Chwee Ming Lim; Zhiwei Huang
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 11.556

10.  Raman spectroscopy identifies radiation response in human non-small cell lung cancer xenografts.

Authors:  Samantha J Harder; Martin Isabelle; Lindsay DeVorkin; Julian Smazynski; Wayne Beckham; Alexandre G Brolo; Julian J Lum; Andrew Jirasek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.