Literature DB >> 15969717

Regeneration mode affects spatial genetic structure of Nothofagus dombeyi forests.

Andrea C Premoli1, Thomas Kitzberger.   

Abstract

Disturbance may generate population bottlenecks by reducing population size and the number of founders establishing a new colony. We tested the hypothesis that the scale of disturbance affects the levels of genetic diversity and the spatial distribution of genotypes in naturally regenerating stands of Nothofagus dombeyi, an evergreen angiosperm tree, in northwestern Patagonia. At similar spatial scales, we predicted that old-growth stands characterized by fine-scale gap phase dynamics would be genetically diverse due to restricted gene flow among temporal and spatially isolated gaps. In contrast, young massively regenerated postfire cohorts resulting from coarse-scale disturbances would be genetically more homogeneous. At each of three paired old-growth and postfire stands a minimum of 50 trees were mapped and sampled within 1 ha. Fresh tissue was collected for isozyme analysis from a total of 361 trees along with tree cores and diameters. Tree age distributions reflected the dominant modes of regeneration. Six out of nine analysed loci were polymorphic. Mean genetic diversity parameters were greater but not significant in mature stands. Fixation indices suggested significant heterozygous deficit at two-thirds of possible tests indicating a Wahlund effect due to local recruitment of related seeds. F(ST) indicated moderate between-stand divergence. Mature stands concentrated half of positively like joins and yielded significant (P < 0.05) autocorrelation coefficients at small distance classes (< 20 m). Fine-scale patch dynamics within mature stands favours the maintenance of fine-scale genetic structure as a result of shade intolerance and local seed dispersal. Conversely, postfire stands suffer the effects of genetic drift given that a few reproductive trees produce a somewhat impoverished and genetically uniform progeny. Bottleneck effects will depend upon the density of remnant trees which could also be a function of the severity of fire.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15969717     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02629.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  6 in total

1.  Disturbance and density-dependent processes (competition and facilitation) influence the fine-scale genetic structure of a tree species' population.

Authors:  Alex Fajardo; Cristian Torres-Díaz; Irène Till-Bottraud
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Is the post-disturbance composition of a plant population determined by selection for outcrossed seedlings or by the composition of the seedbank?

Authors:  D G Roberts; K M Ottewell; R J Whelan; D J Ayre
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Increased fire frequency promotes stronger spatial genetic structure and natural selection at regional and local scales in Pinus halepensis Mill.

Authors:  Katharina B Budde; Santiago C González-Martínez; Miguel Navascués; Concetta Burgarella; Elena Mosca; Zaida Lorenzo; Mario Zabal-Aguirre; Giovanni G Vendramin; Miguel Verdú; Juli G Pausas; Myriam Heuertz
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Fine-scale genetic structure of Nothofagus pumilio (lenga) at contrasting elevations of the altitudinal gradient.

Authors:  Paula Mathiasen; Andrea C Premoli
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 5.  Natural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests.

Authors:  Dominik Thom; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2015-05-22

6.  European invasion of North American Pinus strobus at large and fine scales: high genetic diversity and fine-scale genetic clustering over time in the adventive range.

Authors:  Bohumil Mandák; Věroslava Hadincová; Václav Mahelka; Radka Wildová
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.