Literature DB >> 15968970

Towards cost-value analysis in health care?

E Nord1.   

Abstract

By describing societal value judgements in health care in numerical terms one may in theory increase the precision of guidelines for priority setting and allow decision makers to judge more accurately the degree to which different health care programs provide societal value for money. However, valuing health programs in terms of QALYs disregards salient societal concerns for fairness in resource allocation. A different kind of numerical valuation of medical interventions, that incorporates concerns for fairness, is described. The usefulness to decision makers of such numerical information remains to be tested.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 15968970     DOI: 10.1023/A:1009489122094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  13 in total

1.  The measurement of individual utility and social welfare.

Authors:  P Dolan
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  Health status index models for use in resource allocation decisions. A critical review in the light of observed preferences for social choice.

Authors:  E Nord
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 3.  Intergenerational equity: an exploration of the 'fair innings' argument.

Authors:  A Williams
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Individual utilities are inconsistent with rationing choices: A partial explanation of why Oregon's cost-effectiveness list failed.

Authors:  P A Ubel; G Loewenstein; D Scanlon; M Kamlet
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1996 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  The trade-off between severity of illness and treatment effect in cost-value analysis of health care.

Authors:  E Nord
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  An approach to measuring and valuing health states.

Authors:  H Sintonen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med Med Econ       Date:  1981-06

7.  Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmes.

Authors:  E Nord; J L Pinto; J Richardson; P Menzel; P Ubel
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Persons vs years: two ways of eliciting implicit weights.

Authors:  J A Olsen
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Maximizing health benefits vs egalitarianism: an Australian survey of health issues.

Authors:  E Nord; J Richardson; A Street; H Kuhse; P Singer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 10.  The person-trade-off approach to valuing health care programs.

Authors:  E Nord
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

View more
  6 in total

1.  Guidelines for appropriate care: the importance of empirical normative analysis.

Authors:  M Berg; R T Meulen; M van den Burg
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2001

2.  QALYs: are they helpful to decision makers?

Authors:  Maurice McGregor; J Jaime Caro
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  To fund or not to fund: development of a decision-making framework for the coverage of new health technologies.

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Christopher McCabe; Donald J Philippon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Differences in EQ-5D-3L health state valuations among patients with musculoskeletal diseases, health care professionals and healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Anja Schwalm; You-Shan Feng; Jörn Moock; Thomas Kohlmann
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-10-05

5.  Incorporating Equity Concerns in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Thomas Ward; Ruben E Mujica-Mota; Anne E Spencer; Antonieta Medina-Lara
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Ole F Norheim; Rob Baltussen; Mira Johri; Dan Chisholm; Erik Nord; DanW Brock; Per Carlsson; Richard Cookson; Norman Daniels; Marion Danis; Marc Fleurbaey; Kjell A Johansson; Lydia Kapiriri; Peter Littlejohns; Thomas Mbeeli; Krishna D Rao; Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer; Dan Wikler
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2014-08-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.