Literature DB >> 15968968

Priority setting and evidence based purchasing.

L Frith1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to consider the role that values play in priority setting through the use of EBP. It is important to be clear about the role of values at all levels of the decision making process. At one level, society as a whole has to make decisions about the kind of health provision that it wants. As is generally accepted, these priority setting questions cannot be answered by medical science alone but involve important judgements of value. However, as I hope to show values come into priority setting questions at another level, one not often explicitly recognised in much of the literature: that of the very definition of the effectiveness of treatments. This has important consequences for patient care. If we do not recognise that the effectiveness of a treatment involve subjective elements--a patient's own assessment of the value of the treatment--then this could lead to the belief that we can purchase one treatment that is the most effective for all patients. This might result in a detrimental reduction in the range of options that a patient is given with some patients not receiving the treatment that is most effective for them.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 15968968     DOI: 10.1023/A:1009497307073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  6 in total

Review 1.  Pulmonary artery catheters in the critically ill. An overview using the methodology of evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  A B Cooper; G S Doig; W J Sibbald
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Why research findings are not used by commissions--and what can be done about it.

Authors:  B Stocking
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1995-12

3.  Can contracts drive clinical care?

Authors:  A Hopkins; J K Solomon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-24

4.  Evidence-based medicine: an incomplete method for informing treatment choices.

Authors:  A Maynard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-01-11       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving.

Authors:  W Rosenberg; A Donald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-04-29

6.  Development of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Carol A. Sawka; Vivek Goel; Catherine A. Mahut; Glen A. Taylor; Elaine C. Thiel; Annette M. O'Connor; Ida Ackerman; Janet H. Burt; Elaine H. Gort
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.377

  6 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Implicit normativity in evidence-based medicine: a plea for integrated empirical ethics research.

Authors:  A C Molewijk; A M Stiggelbout; W Otten; H M Dupuis; J Kievit
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-03

2.  Distributive justice and the introduction of generic medicines.

Authors:  Guilhermina Rego; Cristina Brandão; Helena Melo; Rui Nunes
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2002

3.  The values and ethical commitments of doctors engaging in macroallocation: a qualitative and evaluative analysis.

Authors:  Siun Gallagher; Miles Little; Claire Hooker
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.652

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.