Literature DB >> 15968562

Comparison of general practitioner records and patient self-report questionnaires for estimation of costs.

Hema Mistry1, Martin Buxton, Louise Longworth, Judy Chatwin, Robert Peveler.   

Abstract

This study compared resource use data and estimated costs over a 12-month period, based on patient self-report questionnaires and general practitioner records. The level of agreement was measured by weighted kappa. Differences in total costs were plotted against mean total costs. Of 324 patients with complete GP records for the period only 85 (26.2%) had complete self-report data. The recorded number of contacts per patient was higher for patient questionnaires than GP records (17.20 vs. 12.64), and the level of agreement between the two sources was moderate (kappa(w)=0.465). The plots of differences in total costs showed a slight downward bias, suggesting that estimation of total cost from GP records is lower than patient questionnaires. The incompleteness of patient questionnaires forces reliance on GP records as the main source of information for economic evaluations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15968562     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-005-0300-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  8 in total

1.  Primary care contact prior to suicide in individuals with mental illness.

Authors:  Anna Pearson; Pooja Saini; Damian Da Cruz; Caroline Miles; David While; Nicola Swinson; Alyson Williams; Jenny Shaw; Louis Appleby; Navneet Kapur
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Empirical evidence of recall bias for primary health care visits.

Authors:  Natasha Kareem Brusco; Jennifer J Watts
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  COMplex mental health PAThways (COMPAT) Study: A mixed methods study to inform an evidence-based service delivery model for people with complex needs: Study protocol.

Authors:  Pooja Saini; Antony Martin; Jason McIntyre; Anna Balmer; Sam Burton; Hana Roks; Laura Sambrook; Amrith Shetty; Rajan Nathan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Registry data for cross-country comparisons of migrants' healthcare utilization in the EU: a survey study of availability and content.

Authors:  Signe Smith Nielsen; Allan Krasnik; Aldo Rosano
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Reminiscence groups for people with dementia and their family carers: pragmatic eight-centre randomised trial of joint reminiscence and maintenance versus usual treatment: a protocol.

Authors:  Robert T Woods; Errollyn Bruce; Rhiannon T Edwards; Barry Hounsome; John Keady; Esme D Moniz-Cook; Martin Orrell; Ian T Russell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  A methodological framework for assessing agreement between cost-effectiveness outcomes estimated using alternative sources of data on treatment costs and effects for trial-based economic evaluations.

Authors:  Felix Achana; Stavros Petrou; Kamran Khan; Amadou Gaye; Neena Modi
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-02-09

7.  Hip fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation (FEMuR) feasibility study: testing the use of routinely collected data for future health economic evaluations.

Authors:  Nefyn H Williams; Kevin Mawdesley; Jessica L Roberts; Nafees Ud Din; Nicola Totton; Joanna M Charles; Zoe Hoare; Rhiannon T Edwards
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2018-05-07

Review 8.  Aspects and Challenges of Resource Use Measurement in Health Economics: Towards a Comprehensive Measurement Framework.

Authors:  Luca M M Janssen; Ruben M W A Drost; Aggie T G Paulus; Kirsty Garfield; William Hollingworth; Sian Noble; Joanna C Thorn; Irina Pokhilenko; Silvia M A A Evers
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.981

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.