Literature DB >> 15968188

Strain situation after fixation of three-unit ceramic veneered implant superstructures.

Matthias Karl1, Silke Rösch, Friedrich Graef, Thomas D Taylor, Siegfried M Heckmann.   

Abstract

The passive fit of superstructures used in implant prosthodontics is affected by several variables. The objective of this study was to quantify the strain development in various fixed partial dentures (FPDs), both in the condition as cast and after ceramic veneering. Five different types of three-unit FPDs (cementable/repositioning technique impression; cementable/pick-up technique impression; screw-retained/plastic cylinder; screw-retained/gold cylinder; screw-retained/bonded) with 10 samples each, representing commonly used FPD-types, were investigated before and after ceramic veneering. Two ITI implants were anchored in a measurement model simulating a real-life patient situation and strain gauges were mounted close to the implants. The strain development was recorded during cement setting and screw fixation. For statistical analysis, multivariate two-sample tests were performed with the level of significance set at P = 0.1. All FPDs revealed measurable amounts of strain. Neither the impression technique nor the fabrication modes for conventional screw-retained FPDs had a significant influence on strain development. Ceramic veneering caused an increase in strain development for the conventional bridge types. Furthermore, cementing appears to be able to compensate fabrication inaccuracies better than screw retention. The lowest strains were found in FPDs bonded to gold cylinders on the measurement model for metal frames and ceramic-veneered FPDs. Conventional procedures are unable to produce superstructures with an absolute passive fit. The technique of bonding superstructures to prefabricated components in the oral cavity seems to compensate for various shortcomings in superstructure fabrication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15968188     DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000163809.37466.ac

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implant Dent        ISSN: 1056-6163            Impact factor:   2.454


  7 in total

1.  [Effect of materials and superstructure designs on the passive fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses].

Authors:  Shan Song; Zheng Zheng; Li-Yuan Yang; Xu Gao
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-02-01

2.  Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology.

Authors:  Wicher J van der Meer; Frank S Andriessen; Daniel Wismeijer; Yijin Ren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Effect of axial loads on implant-supported partial fixed prostheses by strain gauge analysis.

Authors:  Luis Gustavo Oliveira de Vasconcellos; Renato Sussumu Nishioka; Luana Marotta Reis de Vasconcellos; Lea Nogueira Braulino de Melo Nishioka
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implant-abutment joints: a strain gauge comparative analysis.

Authors:  Renato Sussumu Nishioka; Lea Nogueira Braulino de Melo Nishioka; Celina Wanderley Abreu; Luis Gustavo Oliveira de Vasconcellos; Ivan Balducci
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Management of Buccal Screw Access Hole Positioning for Implant Fixed Complete Dentures: A Report of Two Patients and a Proposed Decision Tree.

Authors:  Fawaz Alzoubi
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2021-12-21

6.  The evolution of dental materials for hybrid prosthesis.

Authors:  Jorge Gonzalez
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2014-05-16

7.  A strain gauge analysis comparing 4-unit veneered zirconium dioxide implant-borne fixed dental prosthesis on engaging and non-engaging abutments before and after torque application.

Authors:  Alyssa Epprecht; Marco Zeltner; Goran Benic; Mutlu Özcan
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2018-02-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.