Literature DB >> 15967913

Uncovering histologic criteria with prognostic significance in toxic epidermal necrolysis.

Adam M Quinn1, Kimberly Brown, Brian K Bonish, Jonathan Curry, Kenneth B Gordon, James Sinacore, Richard Gamelli, Brian J Nickoloff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify histologic criteria and prognostic significance in patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), a frequently lethal disease that usually represents an adverse drug reaction.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of clinical records and histologic material from a 10-year period (1994-2004). Two investigators blinded to clinical data reviewed hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections.
SETTING: North American tertiary care, university-based burn unit. Patients Thirty-seven patients treated for TEN between 1994 and 2004 who had sloughing of 30% or more of their total body surface area and who underwent skin punch biopsies immediately following admission. Main Outcome Measure The degree of dermal mononuclear (DM) inflammation was graded (sparse, moderate, or extensive) at least 2 high-power fields (HPF) away from the perimeter of epidermal detachment, and the mean number of DM cells/5 HPF was quantified for each patient. Clinical records were reviewed and the following data extracted: age, history of cancer, percentage of total body surface area slough, heart rate, and serum glucose, bicarbonate, and serum urea nitrogen values on admission. Severity scores for TEN (SCORTEN) were calculated, and clinical outcome was recorded as survived or died during hospitalization.
RESULTS: Extent of inflammation was assessed by categorizing the mean +/- SD DM cell counts as follows: sparse, 161 +/- 36 cells/HPF (n = 15); moderate, 273 +/- 76 cells/HPF (n = 15); and extensive, 392 +/- 124 cells/HPF (n = 7). There was good concordance between observer ratings (P<.001). While 73% of patients (n = 11) with sparse inflammation survived, only 47% (n = 7) with moderate and 29% (n = 2) with extensive inflammation survived. The accuracy in predicting patient outcome was 65% using grade of inflammation, 68% with mean cell count, and 71% with SCORTEN.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a histologic spectrum with TEN that ranges from sparse to extensive DM inflammation, and degree of inflammation predicts clinical outcome approximately as well as SCORTEN. Future clinical trials should consider the possibility that various patient subsets exist within the TEN population, and a role for immunocytes needs to be critically reevaluated in this devastating disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15967913     DOI: 10.1001/archderm.141.6.683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  12 in total

1.  Attention to TEN.

Authors:  Sanjiv Grover
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

2.  Clinical, etiologic, and histopathologic features of Stevens-Johnson syndrome during an 8-year period at Mayo Clinic.

Authors:  David A Wetter; Michael J Camilleri
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  New insights in toxic epidermal necrolysis (Lyell's syndrome): clinical considerations, pathobiology and targeted treatments revisited.

Authors:  Philippe Paquet; Gérald E Piérard
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Management of Drug-Induced Epidermal Necrolysis (DEN) in Pediatric Patients: Moving from Drug-Induced Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, Overlap and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis to a Single Unifying Diagnosis of DEN.

Authors:  Michele L Ramien; Danny Mansour; Neil H Shear
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.022

5.  Elevation of conjunctival epithelial CD45INTCD11b⁺CD16⁺CD14⁻ neutrophils in ocular Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis.

Authors:  Geraint P Williams; Paul J Tomlins; Alastair K Denniston; H Susan Southworth; Sreekanth Sreekantham; S John Curnow; Saaeha Rauz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 6.  Current Perspectives on Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis.

Authors:  Marianne Lerch; Carlo Mainetti; Benedetta Terziroli Beretta-Piccoli; Thomas Harr
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 10.817

Review 7.  Immunohistopathological Findings of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions.

Authors:  Mari Orime
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 4.818

8.  The Role of IL-13, IL-15 and Granulysin in the Pathogenesis of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis.

Authors:  Michael Sadek; Omer Iqbal; Fakiha Siddiqui; Sean Till; Melissa Mazariegos; Edward Campbell; Kumaran Mudaliar; Jodi Speiser; Emily Bontekoe; Ahmed Kouta; Ambar Farooqui; Bharathi Daravath; Dalia Qneibi; Ramy Sadek; Debra Hoppensteadt; Jawed Fareed; Charles Bouchard
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

9.  Are Multimorbidities Underestimated in Scoring Systems of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Like in SCORTEN?

Authors:  Tobias von Wild; Peter L Stollwerck; Thomas Namdar; Felix H Stang; Peter Mailänder; Frank Siemers
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2012-08-02

10.  Perforated sigmoid diverticulitis in the presence of toxic epidermal necrolysis.

Authors:  P Heye; A Descloux; G Singer; R Rosenberg; T Kocher
Journal:  Case Rep Dermatol       Date:  2014-02-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.