Literature DB >> 15967904

Comparison of the clinical and histological characteristics and survival of distal esophageal-gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in patients with and without barrett mucosa.

Giuseppe Portale1, Jeffrey H Peters, Jeffrey A Hagen, Steven R Demeester, Tasha A K Gandamihardja, Chadin Tharavej, Chih-Cheng Hsieh, Tom R Demeester.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of adenocarcinoma in the distal esophagus and at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) has been increasing in the last decades. It has been suggested that patients in whom Barrett mucosa can be identified in the surgical specimen have a better prognosis compared with those without. This has led to the belief that patients with and without Barrett mucosa may represent 2 distinct cancer types. HYPOTHESIS: Distal esophageal-GEJ adenocarcinoma with and without Barrett mucosa share the same origin, but differ only in clinical presentation and outcome. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Retrospective cohort study in a university tertiary referral center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1992 and 2002, 215 patients (173 men and 42 women; median age, 66 years; age range, 26-91 years) had esophagogastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus-GEJ. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical presentation, tumor characteristics, and survival were compared in patients with Barrett mucosa (n = 140) and those without (n = 75).
RESULTS: Patients with Barrett mucosa in the specimen had tumors that were diagnosed earlier; were smaller in size; earlier in stage, with fewer node metastases; and had a better 5-year survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Observed differences in survival between patients with distal esophageal-GEJ adenocarcinoma with and without Barrett mucosa can be explained by earlier diagnosis. Patients without Barrett mucosa have their tumors detected later, when the disease is more advanced. This suggests the possibility that tumors without Barrett mucosa are not of a different origin, but rather are larger tumors that may have overgrown areas of Barrett mucosa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15967904     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.140.6.570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  7 in total

1.  Effect of a prior endoscopy on outcomes of esophageal adenocarcinoma among United States veterans.

Authors:  Joel H Rubenstein; Amnon Sonnenberg; Jennifer Davis; Laurence McMahon; John M Inadomi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Incidence and predictors of adenocarcinoma following endoscopic ablation of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Yasuda; Sung Eun Choi; Norman S Nishioka; David W Rattner; William P Puricelli; Angela C Tramontano; Seigo Kitano; Chin Hur
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence in individuals with gastroesophageal reflux: synthesis and estimates from population studies.

Authors:  Joel H Rubenstein; James M Scheiman; Shahram Sadeghi; David Whiteman; John M Inadomi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 4.  Carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Qin Huang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Endoscopy in the Elderly: a Cautionary Approach, When to Stop.

Authors:  Rita Abdelmessih; Christopher D Packey; Garrett Lawlor
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09

6.  Surgical factors influencing outcomes in patients resected for cancer of the esophagus or gastric cardia.

Authors:  Martin Sundelöf; Jesper Lagergren; Weimin Ye
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Clinicopathological Features and Increased Expression of Toll-Like Receptor 4 of Gastric Cardia Cancer in a High-Risk Chinese Population.

Authors:  Guangcan Chen; Muming Xu; Jingyao Chen; Liangli Hong; Wenting Lin; Shukun Zhao; Guohong Zhang; Guo Dan; Shuhui Liu
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 4.818

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.