Literature DB >> 15967659

Model systems: mechanisms involved in the loss of sensitivity to letrozole.

Angela Brodie1, Danijela Jelovac, Gauri Sabnis, Brian Long, Luciana Macedo, Olga Goloubeva.   

Abstract

A number of models have been used to study the development and treatment of breast cancer. Since most breast cancer patients are postmenopausal and treated with hormone therapy, we developed a model to simulate this type of patient. Tumors of human estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer cells transfected with aromatase (MCF-7Ca) are grown in immune suppressed mice. In this model, we have explored a number of strategies to optimize the antitumor efficacy of treatment such as combining the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole with the antiestrogens, tamoxifen. This combination resulted in tumor suppression similar to the antiestrogen alone, but was less effective than letrozole alone. Clinical findings with the non-steroidal inhibitor anastrozole in combination with tamoxifen (ATAC trial) were consistent with our results. Although letrozole was the most effective single agent tested in the model, tumors ultimately began to grow during continued treatment. To investigate the mechanisms by which tumors adapt to growth during letrozole treatment, we determined the expression of signaling proteins in tumors during the course of letrozole treatment compared to the tumors of control mice. We found that tumors initially up regulated the ER, but subsequently receptor levels decreased in tumors unresponsive to letrozole. Adapter proteins (p-Shc and Grb-2) as well as all of the signaling proteins in the MAPK cascade (p-Raf, p-Mek1/2, and p-MAPK), but not Akt, were increased in tumors no longer responsive to letrozole. The results suggest that tumor cells adapt to estrogen deprivation during letrozole treatment by activation of alternate signaling pathways to increase transcription. When letrozole was combined with the pure antiestrogen fulvestrant, to down regulate ER, the combination was more effective than either letrozole or fulvestrant alone. Tumors regressed by 45% and were maintained without growth for the duration of the experiment (29 weeks). Down regulation of ER by fulvestrant may prevent cross talk between these signaling pathways. The results suggest that achieving more complete estrogen blockade may delay development of hormone-independent signaling pathways regulating proliferation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15967659     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2005.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol        ISSN: 0960-0760            Impact factor:   4.292


  19 in total

Review 1.  Natural products as aromatase inhibitors.

Authors:  Marcy J Balunas; Bin Su; Robert W Brueggemeier; A Douglas Kinghorn
Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.505

2.  Proteomic signatures of acquired letrozole resistance in breast cancer: suppressed estrogen signaling and increased cell motility and invasiveness.

Authors:  Syreeta L Tilghman; Ian Townley; Qiu Zhong; Patrick P Carriere; Jin Zou; Shawn D Llopis; Lynez C Preyan; Christopher C Williams; Elena Skripnikova; Melyssa R Bratton; Qiang Zhang; Guangdi Wang
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Endometrial Cancers With Activating KRas Mutations Have Activated Estrogen Signaling and Paradoxical Response to MEK Inhibition.

Authors:  Kari L Ring; Melinda S Yates; Rosemarie Schmandt; Michaela Onstad; Qian Zhang; Joseph Celestino; Suet-Ying Kwan; Karen H Lu
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 4.  What do we know about the mechanisms of aromatase inhibitor resistance?

Authors:  Shiuan Chen; Selma Masri; Xin Wang; Sheryl Phung; Yate-Ching Yuan; Xiwei Wu
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 4.292

5.  Adaptive changes result in activation of alternate signaling pathways and acquisition of resistance to aromatase inhibitors.

Authors:  Angela Brodie; Gauri Sabnis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Inhibitory effects of calcitriol on the growth of MCF-7 breast cancer xenografts in nude mice: selective modulation of aromatase expression in vivo.

Authors:  Srilatha Swami; Aruna V Krishnan; Jennifer Y Wang; Kristin Jensen; Lihong Peng; Megan A Albertelli; David Feldman
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.869

7.  Bazedoxifene exhibits antiestrogenic activity in animal models of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer: implications for treatment of advanced disease.

Authors:  Suzanne E Wardell; Erik R Nelson; Christina A Chao; Donald P McDonnell
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  New experimental models for aromatase inhibitor resistance.

Authors:  Shiuan Chen; Selma Masri; Yanyan Hong; Xin Wang; Sheryl Phung; Yate-Ching Yuan; Xiwei Wu
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.292

9.  Models and Mechanisms of Acquired Antihormone Resistance in Breast Cancer: Significant Clinical Progress Despite Limitations.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Sweeney; Russell E McDaniel; Philipp Y Maximov; Ping Fan; V Craig Jordan
Journal:  Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig       Date:  2012-02

10.  Tailored targeted therapy for all: a realistic and worthwhile objective?

Authors:  Per Eystein Lønning
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.