Literature DB >> 15967529

Reduced gamma-band coherence to distorted feedback during speech when what you say is not what you hear.

Judith M Ford1, Max Gray, William O Faustman, Theda H Heinks, Daniel H Mathalon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Communication between the frontal lobes, where speech is generated, and the temporal lobes, where it is perceived, may occur through the action of an efference copy/corollary discharge mechanism that prepares the temporal lobes for the expected sound. We suggest that coherence of EEG in gamma-band between frontal and temporal lobes may reflect the successful action of such a mechanism. We tested the hypothesis that there would be a disruption of gamma-band coherence when the expected auditory consequence of speech does not match the auditory experience.
METHOD: EEG was recorded from 21 healthy adult subjects as they uttered the sound [a:] (Talking condition) and as they heard these recorded sounds played back (Listening condition). As they spoke, subjects heard real-time feedback of the sounds that were: (1) pitch-shifted down one semi-tone, (2) pitch-shifted down one-half of a semi-tone, or (3) not pitch-shifted (veridical), each in separate runs. Event-related gamma coherence between frontal and temporal sites was calculated relative to the onset of the sound, as it was being spoken during Talking, and as it was being played back during Listening.
RESULTS: Frontal-temporal gamma-band coherence spanning 33-43 Hz was greater during Talking than Listening and greater when speech was veridical than when it was distorted a whole semi-tone.
CONCLUSIONS: Gamma-band fronto-temporal synchrony may reflect a "binding of expectation with experience." Disruption of this synchrony may provide feedback to the frontal lobes, particularly regions subserving vocalization, to implement sensorimotor adaptations to either adjust motor programs for speech production in the short run, or to reorganize expectations in the long run.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15967529     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  23 in total

1.  Neural correlates of verbal feedback processing: an fMRI study employing overt speech.

Authors:  Ingrid K Christoffels; Elia Formisano; Niels O Schiller
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Dynamics of event-related causality in brain electrical activity.

Authors:  Anna Korzeniewska; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Rafał Kuś; Piotr J Franaszczuk; Nathan E Crone
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Corollary Discharge Mechanisms During Vocal Production in Marmoset Monkeys.

Authors:  Steven J Eliades; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-06-29

4.  Asynchrony from synchrony: long-range gamma-band neural synchrony accompanies perception of audiovisual speech asynchrony.

Authors:  Sam M Doesburg; Lauren L Emberson; Alan Rahi; David Cameron; Lawrence M Ward
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Long range frontal/posterior phase synchronization during remembered pursuit task is impaired in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Nithin Krishna; Hugh O'Neill; Eva María Sánchez-Morla; Gunvant K Thaker
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Opposing and following responses in sensorimotor speech control: Why responses go both ways.

Authors:  Matthias K Franken; Daniel J Acheson; James M McQueen; Peter Hagoort; Frank Eisner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

7.  Transsaccadic Perception Deficits in Schizophrenia Reflect the Improper Internal Monitoring of Eye Movement Rather Than Abnormal Sensory Processing.

Authors:  Sonia Bansal; Laurence C Jayet Bray; Barbara L Schwartz; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-06-27

8.  The corollary discharge in humans is related to synchronous neural oscillations.

Authors:  Chi-Ming A Chen; Daniel H Mathalon; Brian J Roach; Idil Cavus; Dennis D Spencer; Judith M Ford
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Are self-caused distractors easier to ignore? Experiments with the flanker task.

Authors:  CiJun Gao; Davood G Gozli
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  The perceptual characteristics of voice-hallucinations in deaf people: insights into the nature of subvocal thought and sensory feedback loops.

Authors:  Joanna R Atkinson
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 9.306

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.