Literature DB >> 15967320

Acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis: comparison of findings derived from MR imaging and conventional radiography.

Marcelo R de Abreu1, Christine B Chung, Michelle Wesselly, Hyun Jin-Kim, Donald Resnick.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between routine radiography and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the analysis of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint osteoarthritis (OA). MR imaging studies of the shoulder in 50 patients performed over a 1-year period at a single institution with corresponding conventional radiographic examinations performed within 1 month of the MR imaging study were restrospectively evaluated by the consensus of two musculoskeletal radiologists with special attention to the AC joint. As conclusion, information provided by conventional radiography in the analysis of AC joint OA does not correlate with that provided by MR imaging. AC joint OA is more frequently detected with MR imaging than with radiography. MR imaging provides better assessment of the full extent of AC joint OA and its effect on the underlying RC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15967320     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2004.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Imaging        ISSN: 0899-7071            Impact factor:   1.605


  8 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of subchondral bone marrow lesions in association with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Li Xu; Daichi Hayashi; Frank W Roemer; David T Felson; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  [Systematics of glenohumoral and acromioclavicular arthritis].

Authors:  A Seifarth; F Roemer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  MRI-based semiquantitative scoring of joint pathology in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ali Guermazi; Frank W Roemer; Ida K Haugen; Michel D Crema; Daichi Hayashi
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  [Diseases of the acromioclavicular joint].

Authors:  M Tauber
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Acromioclavicular osteoarthritis and shoulder pain: a review of the role of ultrasonography.

Authors:  Matteo Precerutti; Manuela Formica; Mara Bonardi; Caterina Peroni; Francesco Calciati
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2020-07-15

6.  Non-inferiority and cost-effectiveness trial of isolated biceps tenotomy versus tenotomy with rotator cuff repair in patients with stage 2-3 Goutallier fatty degenerative cuff lesions (TenCuRe study): protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Freek Hollman; Nienke Wolterbeek; Gie Auw Yang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Shoulder MRI features with clinical correlations in subacromial pain syndrome: a cross-sectional and prognostic study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Kvalvaag; Masoud Anvar; Anna Cecilia Karlberg; Jens Ivar Brox; Kaia Beck Engebretsen; Helene Lundgaard Soberg; Niels Gunnar Juel; Erik Bautz-Holter; Leiv Sandvik; Cecilie Roe
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Usefulness of the acromioclavicular joint cross-sectional area as a diagnostic image parameter of acromioclavicular osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Young Joo; Jee Youn Moon; Jung Youn Han; Yun-Sic Bang; Keum Nae Kang; Young Su Lim; Young-Soon Choi; Young-Uk Kim
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 1.337

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.