Literature DB >> 15966340

A three-dimensional examination of the planar nature of the golf swing.

Simon G S Coleman1, Andrew J Rankin.   

Abstract

Previous planar models of the downswing in golf have suggested that upper limb segments (left shoulder girdle and left arm) move in a consistent fixed plane and that the clubhead also moves only in this plane. This study sought to examine these assumptions. Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of seven right-handed golfers of various abilities (handicap 0- 15) was used to define a plane (named the left-arm plane) containing the 7th cervical vertebra, left shoulder and left wrist. We found that the angles of this plane to the reference horizontal z axis and target line axis (parallel to the reference x axis) were not consistent. The angle to the horizontal z axis varied from a mean of 133 degrees (s = 1 degrees) at the start of the downswing to 102 degrees (s = 4 degrees) at impact, suggesting a "steepening" of the left-arm plane. The angle of the plane to the target line changed from - 9 degrees (s = 16 degrees) to 5 degrees (s = 15 degrees) during the same period, showing anticlockwise (from above) rotation, although there was large inter-individual variation. The distance of the clubhead from the left-arm plane was 0.019 m (s = 0.280 m) at the start at the downswing and 0.291 m (s = 0.077 m) at impact, showing that the clubhead did not lie in the same plane as the body segments. We conclude that the left arm and shoulder girdle do not move in a consistent plane throughout the downswing, and that the clubhead does not move in this plane. Previous models of the downswing in golf may therefore be incorrect, and more complex (but realistic) simulations should be performed.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15966340     DOI: 10.1080/02640410410001730179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  8 in total

1.  Kinematic analyses of the golf swing hub path and its role in golfer/club kinetic transfers.

Authors:  Steven M Nesbit; Ryan McGinnis
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Kinetic constrained optimization of the golf swing hub path.

Authors:  Steven M Nesbit; Ryan S McGinnis
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 3.  Golf Swing Biomechanics: A Systematic Review and Methodological Recommendations for Kinematics.

Authors:  Maxime Bourgain; Philippe Rouch; Olivier Rouillon; Patricia Thoreux; Christophe Sauret
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09

Review 4.  The Biomechanics of the Modern Golf Swing: Implications for Lower Back Injuries.

Authors:  Michael H Cole; Paul N Grimshaw
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Competitive elite golf: a review of the relationships between playing results, technique and physique.

Authors:  John Hellström
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.928

6.  Reconstruction Error of Calibration Volume's Coordinates for 3D Swimming Kinematics.

Authors:  Pedro Figueiredo; Leandro Machado; João Paulo Vilas-Boas; Ricardo J Fernandes
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.193

7.  Kinematic evaluation of movement smoothness in golf: relationship between the normalized jerk cost of body joints and the clubhead.

Authors:  Ahnryul Choi; Su-Bin Joo; Euichaul Oh; Joung Hwan Mun
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  The relationships of waist and mid-thigh circumference with performance of college golfers.

Authors:  Seungbum Son; Kunho Han; Wi-Young So
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-03-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.