BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine an appropriate surgical treatment for patients with multiple liver metastases, we evaluated the efficacy of two-stage hepatectomy in patients with multiple bilobular liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. METHODOLOGY: Some patients with multiple liver metastases are not candidates for a complete resection by a single hepatectomy, even when downstaged by chemotherapy, after portal embolization. In two-stage hepatectomy, the highest possible number of tumors is resected in a first, noncurative intervention, and the remaining tumors are resected after a period of liver regeneration. Two-stage hepatectomy was performed in 11 patients. RESULTS: Two-stage hepatectomy was feasible in all of the 11 patients. In 3 of them, the first stage was a major resection (more extensive than a lobectomy). This first hepatectomy was uneventful in all patients. The second hepatectomy was also uneventful in nine patients, but in one of the other two, a perihepatic fluid infection occurred, and in the other, postoperative liver failure developed due to a right subphrenic abscess. However, all patients were discharged. The percentage of the expected resection volume at one time, calculated from CT volumetry, was 75.5+/-1.2% and the prognostic score as surgical risk was 56.6+/-4.5. In two-stage hepatectomy cases, the percentage of the resected volume and the prognostic score in the first hepatectomy were 25.4+/-6.4% and 6.7+/-7.3, and in the second, 45.7+/-4.5% and 28.5+/-5.8. During the follow-up procedures, a residual hepatic recurrence was observed in 6 patients, and pulmonary recurrence in 9. The 1- and 3-year survival rates after the first hepatectomy were 90% and 45%, with median survivals of 18 months from the first hepatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage hepatectomy is a surgical modality intended for patients with initial unresectable metastases. However, following such surgery, protective treatment against residual liver recurrence and lung metastasis will be a most important issue.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine an appropriate surgical treatment for patients with multiple liver metastases, we evaluated the efficacy of two-stage hepatectomy in patients with multiple bilobular liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. METHODOLOGY: Some patients with multiple liver metastases are not candidates for a complete resection by a single hepatectomy, even when downstaged by chemotherapy, after portal embolization. In two-stage hepatectomy, the highest possible number of tumors is resected in a first, noncurative intervention, and the remaining tumors are resected after a period of liver regeneration. Two-stage hepatectomy was performed in 11 patients. RESULTS: Two-stage hepatectomy was feasible in all of the 11 patients. In 3 of them, the first stage was a major resection (more extensive than a lobectomy). This first hepatectomy was uneventful in all patients. The second hepatectomy was also uneventful in nine patients, but in one of the other two, a perihepatic fluid infection occurred, and in the other, postoperative liver failure developed due to a right subphrenic abscess. However, all patients were discharged. The percentage of the expected resection volume at one time, calculated from CT volumetry, was 75.5+/-1.2% and the prognostic score as surgical risk was 56.6+/-4.5. In two-stage hepatectomy cases, the percentage of the resected volume and the prognostic score in the first hepatectomy were 25.4+/-6.4% and 6.7+/-7.3, and in the second, 45.7+/-4.5% and 28.5+/-5.8. During the follow-up procedures, a residual hepatic recurrence was observed in 6 patients, and pulmonary recurrence in 9. The 1- and 3-year survival rates after the first hepatectomy were 90% and 45%, with median survivals of 18 months from the first hepatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage hepatectomy is a surgical modality intended for patients with initial unresectable metastases. However, following such surgery, protective treatment against residual liver recurrence and lung metastasis will be a most important issue.
Authors: Susan Tsai; Hugo P Marques; Mechteld C de Jong; Paulo Mira; Vasco Ribeiro; Michael A Choti; Richard D Schulick; Eduardo Barroso; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.647