OBJECTIVE: To compare compliance with and effectiveness of adaptive servoventilation (ASV) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with the central sleep apnoea syndrome (CSA) with Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) and with congestive heart failure in terms of the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), quality of life, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) over six months. METHODS:25 patients (age 28-80 years, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV) with stable congestive heart failure and CSA-CSR were randomly assigned to either CPAP or ASV. At inclusion, both groups were comparable for NYHA class, LVEF, medical treatment, body mass index, and CSA-CSR. RESULTS: Both ASV and CPAP decreased the AHI but, noticeably, only ASV completely corrected CSA-CSR, with AHI below 10/h. At three months, compliance was comparable between ASV and CPAP; however, at six months compliance with CPAP was significantly less than with ASV. At six months, the improvement in quality of life was higher with ASV and only ASV induced a significant increase in LVEF. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that patients with CSA-CSR may receive greater benefit from treatment with ASV than with CPAP.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare compliance with and effectiveness of adaptive servoventilation (ASV) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with the central sleep apnoea syndrome (CSA) with Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) and with congestive heart failure in terms of the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), quality of life, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) over six months. METHODS: 25 patients (age 28-80 years, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV) with stable congestive heart failure and CSA-CSR were randomly assigned to either CPAP or ASV. At inclusion, both groups were comparable for NYHA class, LVEF, medical treatment, body mass index, and CSA-CSR. RESULTS: Both ASV and CPAP decreased the AHI but, noticeably, only ASV completely corrected CSA-CSR, with AHI below 10/h. At three months, compliance was comparable between ASV and CPAP; however, at six months compliance with CPAP was significantly less than with ASV. At six months, the improvement in quality of life was higher with ASV and only ASV induced a significant increase in LVEF. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that patients with CSA-CSR may receive greater benefit from treatment with ASV than with CPAP.
Authors: K Doghramji; M M Mitler; R B Sangal; C Shapiro; S Taylor; J Walsleben; C Belisle; M K Erman; R Hayduk; R Hosn; E B O'Malley; J M Sangal; S L Schutte; J M Youakim Journal: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Date: 1997-11
Authors: P A Lanfranchi; A Braghiroli; E Bosimini; G Mazzuero; R Colombo; C F Donner; P Giannuzzi Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-03-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: C Monasterio; S Vidal; J Duran; M Ferrer; C Carmona; F Barbé; M Mayos; N Gonzalez-Mangado; M Juncadella; A Navarro; R Barreira; F Capote; L R Mayoralas; G Peces-Barba; J Alonso; J M Montserrat Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2001-09-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Andrew D Calvin; Virend K Somers; Christelle van der Walt; Christopher G Scott; Lyle J Olson Journal: Chest Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Bhavneesh K Sharma; Jessie P Bakker; David G McSharry; Akshay S Desai; Shahrokh Javaheri; Atul Malhotra Journal: Chest Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 9.410