Literature DB >> 15964113

Congenital cervical block vertebrae are associated with caudally adjacent discs.

Gunnar Leivseth1, Wolfgang Frobin, Paul Brinckmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knowledge on the time course of changes in cervical disc height and cervical kinematics at motion segments adjacent to congenital block vertebrae is fragmentary. Compared with this, after surgical fusion of cervical spine segments some find increased degenerative processes in combination with hypermobility or instability while others were unable to confirm these changes. This cross sectional study was undertaken to investigate whether congenital block vertebrae are associated with an increased risk of disc degeneration and hypermobility at adjacent motion segments.
METHODS: In 25 subjects (mean age 40 years) disc height, vertebral height and segmental mobility at motion segments adjacent to a congenital block vertebra were assessed quantitatively by distortion-compensated Roentgen analysis. The findings were compared to a normal database.
FINDINGS: Height of the disc cranially adjacent to the block vertebra did not deviate from the norm while height of the caudally adjacent disc was significantly reduced. The height of the vertebrae adjacent to the block did not deviate from normal. The motion segments formed by the block vertebra and the adjacent discs and vertebrae exhibited no deviation from normal with respect to sagittal plane rotational or translational motion.
INTERPRETATION: Congenital block vertebrae do not result in rotational or translational hyper- or hypomobility at motion segments adjacent to the block. Whether the observed, significant height reduction of the caudally adjacent disc is caused by degeneration following the block formation cannot undoubtedly be concluded as the initial state is not known. Further longitudinal studies are needed to investigate this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15964113     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  6 in total

1.  Radiological Assessment of the Effect of Congenital C3-4 Synostosis on Adjacent Segments.

Authors:  Myung-Sang Moon; Min Geun Yoon; Ki-Tae Kwon; Sung-Su Kim; Jin-Fu Lin; Bong-Jin Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-12-08

2.  Assessment of adjacent-segment mobility after cervical disc replacement versus fusion: RCT with 1 year's results.

Authors:  A Nabhan; B Ishak; W I Steudel; S Ramadhan; O Steimer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Evidence of spondyloarthropathy in the spine of a phytosaur (Reptilia: Archosauriformes) from the Late Triassic of Halberstadt, Germany.

Authors:  Florian Witzmann; Daniela Schwarz-Wings; Oliver Hampe; Guido Fritsch; Patrick Asbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Radiographic Assessment of Effect of Congenital Monosegment Synostosis of Lower Cervical Spine between C2-C6 on Adjacent Mobile Segments.

Authors:  Myung-Sang Moon; Sung-Soo Kim; Min-Geun Yoon; Young Hoon Seo; Bong-Jin Lee; Hanlim Moon; Sung-Sim Kim
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-10-18

5.  Effect of Congenital C4-5 Synostosis on Adjacent Mobile Segments: Radiographic Assessment.

Authors:  Myung-Sang Moon; Won Rak Choi; Hyuon Gyu Lim; Seong Man Jeon; Chang Geun Yu
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2021-04-14

6.  Are Congenital Cervical Block Vertebrae a Risk Factor for Adjacent Segment Disease? A Retrospective Cross-Sectional CT and MR Imaging Study.

Authors:  Cornelius Jung; Patrick Asbach; Stefan M Niehues
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.