PURPOSE: To estimate the response rate and toxicity associated with intravenous topotecan when it is administered on a protracted schedule according to a pharmacokinetically guided dosing approach to treat childhood high-risk neuroblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective phase II trial, topotecan was administered intravenously daily for 5 days for each of 2 consecutive weeks for two cycles. On the basis of topotecan systemic clearance, doses were individualized to attain a single-day topotecan lactone area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of 80 to 120 ng/mL . h. Patients subsequently received standard treatment. RESULTS: Both cycles were administered to 28 (93%) of the 30 enrolled patients (median age, 3.1 years). Target topotecan AUCs were achieved in 92 (72%) of the 127 measurements conducted after pharmacokinetically guided adjustment; the median dosage required to achieve target AUCs was 2.7 mg/m(2) (range, 0.95 to 3.8 mg/m(2)). The response rate was 60% (95% CI, 41% to 77%); there were one complete and 17 partial responses. No patient experienced disease progression during initial topotecan therapy. Primary tumor volumes decreased (median decrease, -58.2%; range, -95.1% to -4.9%) in the 26 patients with available size data. Homovanillic acid levels in 16 (89%) of 18 patients and vanillylmandelic acid levels in 14 (78%) of 18 patients were lower (P = .002 and P = .018, respectively) after topotecan therapy. Reversible grade 4 myelosuppression occurred in all patients, but no deaths occurred as a result of infection or toxicity. CONCLUSION: Topotecan is active against neuroblastoma when it is administered on a protracted schedule and targeted systemic exposure is achieved.
PURPOSE: To estimate the response rate and toxicity associated with intravenous topotecan when it is administered on a protracted schedule according to a pharmacokinetically guided dosing approach to treat childhood high-risk neuroblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective phase II trial, topotecan was administered intravenously daily for 5 days for each of 2 consecutive weeks for two cycles. On the basis of topotecan systemic clearance, doses were individualized to attain a single-day topotecan lactone area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of 80 to 120 ng/mL . h. Patients subsequently received standard treatment. RESULTS: Both cycles were administered to 28 (93%) of the 30 enrolled patients (median age, 3.1 years). Target topotecan AUCs were achieved in 92 (72%) of the 127 measurements conducted after pharmacokinetically guided adjustment; the median dosage required to achieve target AUCs was 2.7 mg/m(2) (range, 0.95 to 3.8 mg/m(2)). The response rate was 60% (95% CI, 41% to 77%); there were one complete and 17 partial responses. No patient experienced disease progression during initial topotecan therapy. Primary tumor volumes decreased (median decrease, -58.2%; range, -95.1% to -4.9%) in the 26 patients with available size data. Homovanillic acid levels in 16 (89%) of 18 patients and vanillylmandelic acid levels in 14 (78%) of 18 patients were lower (P = .002 and P = .018, respectively) after topotecan therapy. Reversible grade 4 myelosuppression occurred in all patients, but no deaths occurred as a result of infection or toxicity. CONCLUSION:Topotecan is active against neuroblastoma when it is administered on a protracted schedule and targeted systemic exposure is achieved.
Authors: Peter J Houghton; Christopher L Morton; Min Kang; C Patrick Reynolds; Catherine A Billups; Edward Favours; Debbie Payne-Turner; Chandra Tucker; Malcolm A Smith Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Julie R Park; Jeffrey R Scott; Clinton F Stewart; Wendy B London; Arlene Naranjo; Victor M Santana; Peter J Shaw; Susan L Cohn; Katherine K Matthay Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thomas P Stricker; Andres Morales La Madrid; Alexandre Chlenski; Lisa Guerrero; Helen R Salwen; Yasmin Gosiengfiao; Elizabeth J Perlman; Wayne Furman; Armita Bahrami; Jason M Shohet; Peter E Zage; M John Hicks; Hiroyuki Shimada; Rie Suganuma; Julie R Park; Sara So; Wendy B London; Peter Pytel; Kirsteen H Maclean; Susan L Cohn Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: K A Kasow; C F Stewart; R C Barfield; N L Wright; C Li; D K Srivastava; W Leung; E M Horwitz; L C Bowman; R Handgretinger; G A Hale Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2012-03-19 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Peter J Houghton; Richard Lock; Hernan Carol; Christopher L Morton; Doris Phelps; Richard Gorlick; E Anders Kolb; Stephen T Keir; C Patrick Reynolds; Min H Kang; John M Maris; Amy W Wozniak; Yongchuan Gu; William R Wilson; Malcolm A Smith Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2010-12-27 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Beate C Litzenburger; Chad J Creighton; Anna Tsimelzon; Bonita T Chan; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Tao Wang; Joan M Carboni; Marco M Gottardis; Fei Huang; Jenny C Chang; Michael T Lewis; Mothaffar F Rimawi; Adrian V Lee Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-12-22 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Austin P Dove; Bogdan-Alexandru Manole; Daniel V Wakefield; Shane J Cross; Michael Doubrovin; Barry L Shulkin; Thomas E Merchant; Andrew M Davidoff; Wayne L Furman; Matthew J Krasin; Victor M Santana; John T Lucas Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2018-09-30 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Thorsten Simon; Alfred Längler; Urs Harnischmacher; Michael C Frühwald; Norbert Jorch; Alexander Claviez; Frank Berthold; Barbara Hero Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2007-05-04 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Hernan Carol; Peter J Houghton; Christopher L Morton; E Anders Kolb; Richard Gorlick; C Patrick Reynolds; Min H Kang; John M Maris; Stephen T Keir; Amy Watkins; Malcolm A Smith; Richard B Lock Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: K Elaine Hubbard; Paula Schaiquevich; Feng Bai; Charles H Fraga; Laura Miller; John C Panetta; Clinton F Stewart Journal: Biomed Chromatogr Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 1.902