Literature DB >> 15961504

Maximum likelihood of evolutionary trees: hardness and approximation.

Benny Chor1, Tamir Tuller.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Maximum likelihood (ML) is an increasingly popular optimality criterion for selecting evolutionary trees. Yet the computational complexity of ML was open for over 20 years, and only recently resolved by the authors for the Jukes-Cantor model of substitution and its generalizations. It was proved that reconstructing the ML tree is computationally intractable (NP-hard). In this work we explore three directions, which extend that result.
RESULTS: (1) We show that ML under the assumption of molecular clock is still computationally intractable (NP-hard). (2) We show that not only is it computationally intractable to find the exact ML tree, even approximating the logarithm of the ML for any multiplicative factor smaller than 1.00175 is computationally intractable. (3) We develop an algorithm for approximating log-likelihood under the condition that the input sequences are sparse. It employs any approximation algorithm for parsimony, and asymptotically achieves the same approximation ratio. We note that ML reconstruction for sparse inputs is still hard under this condition, and furthermore many real datasets satisfy it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15961504     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  14 in total

1.  Fast and consistent estimation of species trees using supermatrix rooted triples.

Authors:  Michael DeGiorgio; James H Degnan
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  A LASSO-based approach to sample sites for phylogenetic tree search.

Authors:  Noa Ecker; Dana Azouri; Ben Bettisworth; Alexandros Stamatakis; Yishay Mansour; Itay Mayrose; Tal Pupko
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 6.931

3.  PALM: a paralleled and integrated framework for phylogenetic inference with automatic likelihood model selectors.

Authors:  Shu-Hwa Chen; Sheng-Yao Su; Chen-Zen Lo; Kuei-Hsien Chen; Teng-Jay Huang; Bo-Han Kuo; Chung-Yen Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  MetaPIGA v2.0: maximum likelihood large phylogeny estimation using the metapopulation genetic algorithm and other stochastic heuristics.

Authors:  Raphaël Helaers; Michel C Milinkovitch
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Evolutionary distances in the twilight zone--a rational kernel approach.

Authors:  Roland F Schwarz; William Fletcher; Frank Förster; Benjamin Merget; Matthias Wolf; Jörg Schultz; Florian Markowetz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Phylogenetic analyses: A toolbox expanding towards Bayesian methods.

Authors:  Stéphane Aris-Brosou; Xuhua Xia
Journal:  Int J Plant Genomics       Date:  2008

7.  FastMG: a simple, fast, and accurate maximum likelihood procedure to estimate amino acid replacement rate matrices from large data sets.

Authors:  Cuong Cao Dang; Vinh Sy Le; Olivier Gascuel; Bart Hazes; Quang Si Le
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Efficient tree searches with available algorithms.

Authors:  Gonzalo Giribet
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 1.625

9.  COX4-like, a Nuclear-Encoded Mitochondrial Gene Duplicate, Is Essential for Male Fertility in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Mohammadmehdi Eslamieh; Ayda Mirsalehi; Dragomira N Markova; Esther Betrán
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  HIV-1 tropism dynamics and phylogenetic analysis from longitudinal ultra-deep sequencing data of CCR5- and CXCR4-using variants.

Authors:  Mariano M Sede; Franco A Moretti; Natalia L Laufer; Leandro R Jones; Jorge F Quarleri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.